Depending upon ChatGPT heavily with little bit of reading on Doctrine of Rights and Doctrine of Virtue in past and with deep desire to appreciate Kants morality but equally unsatisfied soul I am making some points: 1. Universal one can be ascribed to only one i.e. Ultimate or Brahaman to which we could not even say truth, God or anything as it is free from any qualities (Nirgunna) and name is representation of quality, 2. Everything other than that is in Law of their own, 3. When everything else including Human being who desires to establish set of laws for themselves also hold different qualities and hence their own Law, 4. Universalizing everything else is contrary to the idea of universe itself, 5. Hence, to base Law and Morality to universal reasoning or universalizing the situation is infeasible for eg. Doctor operates x's eyes and x lost them, now universalizing behavior of Doctor what if everyone operate in that method and loose their eyes, it is not feasible hence th...