Skip to main content

Learning Model of Upanishad

Who will go through those text again... Just trying to relate some insights here There are few stories in various major (top 10) reciting how the students learned with their teacher (Bhrigu with Varuna, Indra with Prajapati,Svetaketu with Aruni). I never thought these stories and their relevance in that particular context. Upanishad is itself learning in proximity of Guru, wow just wow, and these stories are relating student and their teachers. Unlike classrom practice or guidance of Guru often prescribed in Smritis where service of Guru is the primary mode of learning or by grace of Guru one should learn, these stories simply show patience, in all these stories, Teacher(Guru or Bramhabetta) cater knoweledge that the student is capable of handaling or one can say, knowledge take one's mind in the form of insight or cloud that is full of water yet unable to shower, only there Guru strike with his enlightment and only to the extent student's insight, student will yield. However, teacher say it is not enough and do not even deliver any futher knowledge, what is not sufficient, it is the duty of studnet to reach there. This learning model is quite different from Vedic Karmakanda with repeatition, harsh form of Yoga, dialouge or debate of Greeks where Socarate first question show darkness and then enlighten. Here, knowledge is discovery, teacher dont intervene in the process and the seed is allowed to be tree in its fullest. ......

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Hindu Jurisprudence- Smriti And some property law

I just don’t have the energy to write against the popular teaching (perhaps I have read the wrong books) that Hindu jurisprudence is contained within the Smriti, mainly the Manusmriti, and the property systems of the two schools — Mitakshara and Dayabhaga (I forget which region each school belongs to). But these are laws, not jurisprudence. I admit I do not know the subject of jurisprudence deeply — such a tragedy — but it seems to me these were laws made for the time and place according to the wisdom of the sages of that era. The Smriti writers themselves clearly said that the source of their understanding is the Veda. So, anyone who wants to understand exactly what truth Hindus hold must study the Vedas. Those who cannot may go through the Upanishads (major texts distilled by sages to teach the essence of the Jñāna part of the Veda). Those who still find that difficult may turn to the Mahabharata (which is in itself a “great battle” to understand), or they may study Mīmāṁsā, Nyāya-śā...

Dharma - Nyaya

(To clear my thought process ) Dharma is that which bears, that which provides stability to a thing, a person, or a nation in motion. Nyaya is specific to the individual; A person who abides in Dharma may still be affected by the Adharma of another who fails to uphold it then the State/Society must inject Nyaya to tha specific person or group or even state. Jurisprudence (in my limited understanding and information ) could not ditinguish between these two concepts and confused it with morale, divine rule, command, society, economics etc. These two are related, but Dharma is what guides the Naya but here it has nothing to do with legal system, it is independent and move with truth, whereas Naya alone requires legal system. Hence, Jurisprudence has long divorced its essence of Dharma (somehow natural school using reason could hover around truth) and focus on legal system alone. ..................

Sabda Bramha-Words are everything

They say Om is Sabda Bramha Vayu is Pratakshya Bramha I(Aatma) am Bramha I am the essence Sounds and letters ignite the mind They are capable of saying new things to mind Though not against Rit of the Bramhanda But they dont repeat they enlighten If that word be Om or Ram or Radha or Radhe or Bramha or Agni or Indra or Savita or ... No joy can match the joy of Naam Jap When emotion is so strong it lost itself in Mother then words may loose themselves But words no matter what are capable of carrying what is forgotten and what will one become etc. Title may demand more explanation - -- - -- - -- -