They say Om is Sabda Bramha
Vayu is Pratakshya Bramha
I(Aatma) am Bramha
I am the essence
Sounds and letters ignite the mind
They are capable of saying new things to mind
Though not against Rit of the Bramhanda
But they dont repeat they enlighten
If that word be Om or Ram or Radha or Radhe or Bramha or Agni or Indra or Savita or ...
No joy can match the joy of Naam Jap
When emotion is so strong it lost itself in Mother then words may loose themselves
But words no matter what are capable of carrying what is forgotten and what will one become
etc.
Title may demand more explanation - -- - -- - -- -
I just don’t have the energy to write against the popular teaching (perhaps I have read the wrong books) that Hindu jurisprudence is contained within the Smriti, mainly the Manusmriti, and the property systems of the two schools — Mitakshara and Dayabhaga (I forget which region each school belongs to). But these are laws, not jurisprudence. I admit I do not know the subject of jurisprudence deeply — such a tragedy — but it seems to me these were laws made for the time and place according to the wisdom of the sages of that era. The Smriti writers themselves clearly said that the source of their understanding is the Veda. So, anyone who wants to understand exactly what truth Hindus hold must study the Vedas. Those who cannot may go through the Upanishads (major texts distilled by sages to teach the essence of the Jñāna part of the Veda). Those who still find that difficult may turn to the Mahabharata (which is in itself a “great battle” to understand), or they may study Mīmāṁsā, Nyāya-śā...
Comments
Post a Comment