Numbers are:
i. they are counting without their own meaning
ii. they cannot lead you without a unit
iii. they are efficient for repetition
Since numbers are counting, only material things can be counted upon. They can be recorded with reference to a benchmark. We can see the inability of numbers to capture the value of capital. Whatever is in the future, they cannot, because it lacks the material which has already existed. Capital is something that will exist in the future. Hence, numbers need past events and also the benchmark against which measurement or counting can be made.
They only repeat. You earn 10, 100, 1000, 10000, etc., by trading or producing or through employment; you repeat the same thing again and again, just by scaling it up. Here only scaling is quality—or something that transcends, a movement from one loop to another. Numbers give great satisfaction upon a false sense of security. They repeat. Two men, twenty, two thousand, etc.—they are still men and therefore repetition. Someone truly breaking this loop is something else, and cannot be counted upon as man alone again. Likewise, anything that a number is assigned to is the product of repetition and thus cannot lead one outside the loop.
Random: We can count life, from first breath to last; still, it is a number, and yet life. When the fire transcends into light, from its potential to exhaustion, in between it blazes—and we call it fire. That is where one transcends. We can burn fire again and again, thus counting the process of burning something, yet something skips the loop.
I just don’t have the energy to write against the popular teaching (perhaps I have read the wrong books) that Hindu jurisprudence is contained within the Smriti, mainly the Manusmriti, and the property systems of the two schools — Mitakshara and Dayabhaga (I forget which region each school belongs to). But these are laws, not jurisprudence. I admit I do not know the subject of jurisprudence deeply — such a tragedy — but it seems to me these were laws made for the time and place according to the wisdom of the sages of that era. The Smriti writers themselves clearly said that the source of their understanding is the Veda. So, anyone who wants to understand exactly what truth Hindus hold must study the Vedas. Those who cannot may go through the Upanishads (major texts distilled by sages to teach the essence of the Jñāna part of the Veda). Those who still find that difficult may turn to the Mahabharata (which is in itself a “great battle” to understand), or they may study Mīmāṁsā, Nyāya-śā...
Comments
Post a Comment