Skip to main content

Removing mother archetype from thinking pattern

Who is a mother to a child?
A source of everything—
A source of love and food,
A source of mercy and kindness.

The whole world may go silent,
But a mother—she cannot.
She is Devi, Devil, and Brahma.
No one is ever needed twice—but her.

She is the black, and she the white.
She is the earth, and she is the sky.
She has sacrificed her life for a boy—
To run away from her is nothing but sin.

O child, your mother has long been
Embedded deeply within you.
Your ethics, morality, and boundaries—
They are no one else but your mother in you.

Sometimes you try to shower love,
Sometimes you search for it here and there.
Sometimes you sacrifice yourself,
Sometimes you ask others to do the same.

A boy must become a man someday.
He must become a man by knowing:
Mother is mother, and he is he—
Her sacred life he never can imitate.

Neither is every woman a mother,
Nor is every man a father.
A mother is a mother to her children,
A father, a father to his.

This is a bond, a blessed relation.
The human mind is like a mirror—
It often paints itself with images
And forgets what is real, and what is not.

Let this immense love for your mother
Remain just that—love for your mother.
Not every woman must be your mother;
They too have children to awaken these feelings.

The Moon is sweet and nourishing by nature.
But one must not impose her ways on the Sun.
Night gives birth to day, but night is night—
And day should not be called to rest.


##

On this auspicious day,
I bow to the great Uma,
Who bestowed the knowledge of Brahma to Indra—
As recorded in the Kenopanishad.



Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Hindu Jurisprudence- Smriti And some property law

I just don’t have the energy to write against the popular teaching (perhaps I have read the wrong books) that Hindu jurisprudence is contained within the Smriti, mainly the Manusmriti, and the property systems of the two schools — Mitakshara and Dayabhaga (I forget which region each school belongs to). But these are laws, not jurisprudence. I admit I do not know the subject of jurisprudence deeply — such a tragedy — but it seems to me these were laws made for the time and place according to the wisdom of the sages of that era. The Smriti writers themselves clearly said that the source of their understanding is the Veda. So, anyone who wants to understand exactly what truth Hindus hold must study the Vedas. Those who cannot may go through the Upanishads (major texts distilled by sages to teach the essence of the Jñāna part of the Veda). Those who still find that difficult may turn to the Mahabharata (which is in itself a “great battle” to understand), or they may study Mīmāṁsā, Nyāya-śā...

Dharma - Nyaya

(To clear my thought process ) Dharma is that which bears, that which provides stability to a thing, a person, or a nation in motion. Nyaya is specific to the individual; A person who abides in Dharma may still be affected by the Adharma of another who fails to uphold it then the State/Society must inject Nyaya to tha specific person or group or even state. Jurisprudence (in my limited understanding and information ) could not ditinguish between these two concepts and confused it with morale, divine rule, command, society, economics etc. These two are related, but Dharma is what guides the Naya but here it has nothing to do with legal system, it is independent and move with truth, whereas Naya alone requires legal system. Hence, Jurisprudence has long divorced its essence of Dharma (somehow natural school using reason could hover around truth) and focus on legal system alone. ..................

Vedas- The Ultimate -Darshan lets not say Philosophy it will be injustice to Great Sages

Vedas -Nobody knows what is it, it is praised by Sages of later dates hence people still praise it -I have not read any piece of paper (except the Secret of Vedas by Sri Aurobindo) which relates Vedas to Pshychology (which I think is still inadaquate (daring to challenge legend in my own foolishness)). 1.Some recites it like parrots 2. Some criticize it like Vedic sages were just fancy poets with lots of imagination 3. Some give it credit to later Vedantic development as part of Methods of Knowledge, which means Vedas are cave men and Vedanta were modern men 4. Some laugh about it since they worship Sun Moon lightening air etc. etc. Let me go one by one 1. reciting with full faith and accuracy have some benefits but it will limit to the level of brain only and that too for soothing purposes and other, which will produces mechanical results (results are bound to happen) 2. too poor may be who translated and criticizes it must lack knowledge of Vedangas, they were expert in musical no...