Skip to main content

Wealth---> WHY

What is wealth? -

power to purchase and ensure future consumption too

When will it become capital? 

When the purpose is to renew its purchasing power with added or accumulating premium with other compensation for inflation etc.

Is it evil? 

No it is not. It is always beneficial to have wealth whether with individual, society or with country. It is the most beneficial thing human can have.

Is it beneficial? 

Yes.

Where does it originate? 

Nature may have provided everything else for us. However, God may have entrusted human with enhancing the evolution of life towards God. The first step is ensuring life saving facilities. Like everything else, these facilities too need renewal and advancement. The need to consume is eternal and to facilitate consumption with ease is where wealth originate. Advance society have complex goods and facilities which are wealth and backward society like ours still have land as primary wealth. Land of course facilitate consumption but it is basic compared with advancement of other societies.

Is wealth related with politics? 

Politics is the method of distribution of wealth generated by a society as a whole. When evils control politics then it appears that wealth is evil. Wealth is always beneficial- irony it even benefits evils. Slowly they eat out wealth without regenerating it, and wealth leave them like a life leave the old bodies leaving it to fire. 


Now infer on your own why one must create wealth, if not, earn it, if not help to preserve it. Touch it with dirty hand and it will or she will corrupt you not herself. 


XYZ and TIME (Homgrami)


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Hindu Jurisprudence- Smriti And some property law

I just don’t have the energy to write against the popular teaching (perhaps I have read the wrong books) that Hindu jurisprudence is contained within the Smriti, mainly the Manusmriti, and the property systems of the two schools — Mitakshara and Dayabhaga (I forget which region each school belongs to). But these are laws, not jurisprudence. I admit I do not know the subject of jurisprudence deeply — such a tragedy — but it seems to me these were laws made for the time and place according to the wisdom of the sages of that era. The Smriti writers themselves clearly said that the source of their understanding is the Veda. So, anyone who wants to understand exactly what truth Hindus hold must study the Vedas. Those who cannot may go through the Upanishads (major texts distilled by sages to teach the essence of the Jñāna part of the Veda). Those who still find that difficult may turn to the Mahabharata (which is in itself a “great battle” to understand), or they may study Mīmāṁsā, Nyāya-śā...

Sabda Bramha-Words are everything

They say Om is Sabda Bramha Vayu is Pratakshya Bramha I(Aatma) am Bramha I am the essence Sounds and letters ignite the mind They are capable of saying new things to mind Though not against Rit of the Bramhanda But they dont repeat they enlighten If that word be Om or Ram or Radha or Radhe or Bramha or Agni or Indra or Savita or ... No joy can match the joy of Naam Jap When emotion is so strong it lost itself in Mother then words may loose themselves But words no matter what are capable of carrying what is forgotten and what will one become etc. Title may demand more explanation - -- - -- - -- -

Dharma - Nyaya

(To clear my thought process ) Dharma is that which bears, that which provides stability to a thing, a person, or a nation in motion. Nyaya is specific to the individual; A person who abides in Dharma may still be affected by the Adharma of another who fails to uphold it then the State/Society must inject Nyaya to tha specific person or group or even state. Jurisprudence (in my limited understanding and information ) could not ditinguish between these two concepts and confused it with morale, divine rule, command, society, economics etc. These two are related, but Dharma is what guides the Naya but here it has nothing to do with legal system, it is independent and move with truth, whereas Naya alone requires legal system. Hence, Jurisprudence has long divorced its essence of Dharma (somehow natural school using reason could hover around truth) and focus on legal system alone. ..................