Skip to main content

Jagat Mithya, Bramha Satya

 Upanishad (Mandukya etc.) primarily divided reality into 4 divisions without confusing with lokaa. 

1 Jagriti

Waking state where experience we perceive by sensory organs take place. Also, if we divide the total life per day into 3 equal 8 hours then 2 part every day falls in this part. Anyone's 2/3 life is spent in this state. Also, physical realities or interaction with matter take place in this state due to physical activity. Here, jagriti is experience related reality rather than physical reality of the universe. 

2 Swapna

In absence of access to Suspti or Turiya, repetition of what has been perceived in Jagriti state. Also, ones desire etc roam around in this state. One need not be in sleep, though during sleep this state is prominent and hence in our vague approximation 1/3 of life is spent in this state. Though all mental activities or replication of past experiences is dream. Which is not present experience nor experience at all but the remembrance of something happened or wished to happen.

3 Susupti

This one is absence of 1 and 2. It can be termed as Sunya. One can confuse this with highest as nothing exist here or due to inability to recollect any activity as in 1 or 2, it can be thought of as ultimate. Since, this state is also perceived by something else it can not be the highest. Neither senses of 1, nor mind of 2 can access it. Only pure observer takes account of it.

4 Turiya

Highest or the observer who can account 1,2 and 3 simultaneously and yet unattached to any one of those states. This is the Bramha. 

why 4 alone is reality?

So explained by Adi Guru Shanakaracharya (as much as I understand), since all 1,2 and 3 does not have beginning or an end, it is fictional. All these 3 Jagat are therefore Mithya or unreal. Unreal not by experience but by their relative position from 4. Since, 4 originate 1,2,3 and some even extend all matter too originate by 4 (still I am not sure about it) but it is true all these experiences are originate from something other than 1,2 and 3. Very much  observable at time of birth and death, something came experienced and be gone. But who is this real, who experience essence of lives in these 3 states. May be by same logic it must originated matter for its experience. Thereby becoming the Sadhan, Sadhana, Sadhak  nothing but one Sadhya.  

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Hindu Jurisprudence- Smriti And some property law

I just don’t have the energy to write against the popular teaching (perhaps I have read the wrong books) that Hindu jurisprudence is contained within the Smriti, mainly the Manusmriti, and the property systems of the two schools — Mitakshara and Dayabhaga (I forget which region each school belongs to). But these are laws, not jurisprudence. I admit I do not know the subject of jurisprudence deeply — such a tragedy — but it seems to me these were laws made for the time and place according to the wisdom of the sages of that era. The Smriti writers themselves clearly said that the source of their understanding is the Veda. So, anyone who wants to understand exactly what truth Hindus hold must study the Vedas. Those who cannot may go through the Upanishads (major texts distilled by sages to teach the essence of the Jñāna part of the Veda). Those who still find that difficult may turn to the Mahabharata (which is in itself a “great battle” to understand), or they may study Mīmāṁsā, Nyāya-śā...

Sabda Bramha-Words are everything

They say Om is Sabda Bramha Vayu is Pratakshya Bramha I(Aatma) am Bramha I am the essence Sounds and letters ignite the mind They are capable of saying new things to mind Though not against Rit of the Bramhanda But they dont repeat they enlighten If that word be Om or Ram or Radha or Radhe or Bramha or Agni or Indra or Savita or ... No joy can match the joy of Naam Jap When emotion is so strong it lost itself in Mother then words may loose themselves But words no matter what are capable of carrying what is forgotten and what will one become etc. Title may demand more explanation - -- - -- - -- -

APPL Fama-French three factor model

This model is built purely for educational and illustrative purposes. It is a simplified implementation of the Fama-French 3-factor model applied to Apple's historical returns. The model has not been validated for investment, trading, or financial advisory use.