Skip to main content

"Anitya" Karmayogi's duality problem

 The word "Anitya" may not be well defined without the word "Nitya" or which is regular or going on. Then by adding "Aa", it will lead to which is not regular or not in cycle. Since cycle is time, Anitya must be timeless. Like Adi Shankaracharya in explanation of Taitriya Upanishad said that which is Nitya is performed by action and is not permanent. Analyzing backward, all that is performed by action are regular or temporary, they will die. Everything under time will go change or regular or temporary or will die. Then action is nothing but the beginning of life that will results in death or transformation into something else. Whatever a man will do is action, even the KARMAYOGA which is often misunderstood as doing something, it is involuntary action (according to one's duty and without intervention) with perfection. For spiritual seeker it is Yagic Karma and not other xyzzy daily routine things. Since Karma Yoga is Yagic form is symbolical representation of universal truth, it will remind the Yajaman to seek what is behind. Also, the Gyankanda or the path of Upanishad too is action. It is also thinking or exchanging the conversation between the Guru and Sishya in near proximity of Bramha Gyan. Since, this conversation too, and mental conversation too with oneself is action. It will lead to death alone, it is not permanent. then  what is "Anitya", what road will lead to Anitya? They say Vayu is the self present Bramha, and many yogic practices are surrounded around it. Also, KHASS worship Vayu in Masto form and also their departed ancestors in Vayu form. Since, till the body function properly, breathing is the only involuntary action for men. They can't stop or start it on their will. They are simply helpless in this regard. Even their mind can't control it. Rather a good breathing smooth functioning of mind. "Nitya" is not "Rita" controlled by Varuna. xyzzy..... "Anitya" can't be set into action, action is performed as it is as its part that is the only logical conclusion. Something that is ever present must be the cause of things and action which can't result in permanent fruits. Rather they are the fruits of something ever present and reverts back to that ever present. Since, the child replicate its mother, Nitya is a child of Anitya, Nitya is also part of Anitya and try hard to be like Anitya. Since one is the product of another they are one. Like a mother can know the birth of a child and a child can't know the birth of the mother, Nitya can't know the nature of Anitya. but the Anitya knows the birth and life and death of its child, also is benevolent to end the child when it is no more enjoying the fruits of life. Duality is the problem of Nitya and not of Anitya. Nitya must long for duality of truth for claiming its own existence. xyzzy ....

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Averaging practice in stock market and Liquidity problem in Banking

Investors in equity market (secondary) are quite familiar with averaging practice of prices. When a stock of higher cost was already purchased but the prices drop down, then purchasing stocks at lower prices (must be probable to gain some increment in those latest prices) will average the per unit cost and given increment in latest prices but lower than previous prices till make loss over previously purchased stock lesser loss making. Now, thinking the institutional capacity of banks and financial institutions and production and distribution capacity of national economy, given flood of remittance, there must be a lag in mobilization of funds through banks. Thereby keeping interest rate at lower side till national economy's capacity to produce and distribute gets increased. However, let's imagine a scenario where funds are ever demanded and loans are distributed at higher cost. Deposit rates are increased in the name of liquidity problem or liquidity premium is so high that retu...

Hindu Jurisprudence- Smriti And some property law

I just don’t have the energy to write against the popular teaching (perhaps I have read the wrong books) that Hindu jurisprudence is contained within the Smriti, mainly the Manusmriti, and the property systems of the two schools — Mitakshara and Dayabhaga (I forget which region each school belongs to). But these are laws, not jurisprudence. I admit I do not know the subject of jurisprudence deeply — such a tragedy — but it seems to me these were laws made for the time and place according to the wisdom of the sages of that era. The Smriti writers themselves clearly said that the source of their understanding is the Veda. So, anyone who wants to understand exactly what truth Hindus hold must study the Vedas. Those who cannot may go through the Upanishads (major texts distilled by sages to teach the essence of the Jñāna part of the Veda). Those who still find that difficult may turn to the Mahabharata (which is in itself a “great battle” to understand), or they may study Mīmāṁsā, Nyāya-śā...

Usha

I bow down to mother Vindhyabasini/Brindabasini/Bindubasini whose grace and affection alone uplift unbearable pain of this life/ignorance. Nobody but Guru Gorakhnath is my Guru but am not that fortunate to get knowledge from himself. Neither read anything written by him.  During the discussion with few wise men it suddenly occurred or reiterate the already obtained knowledge of unreal nature of thoughts. However, this just helped to connect Usha with Savitur and once again ignite enthusiasm to write meaning of Gayatri Mantra. First line is dedicated to three kind of Jagat or realities excluding Om (which is not a wise thing to do but Om itself contains 3 Jagat and one last supreme reality so it is waste to discuss other line after explaining Om). First one is almost 16 hours a day i.e. waking state where we gather all information and act upon them. Second is dream state which is in its concrete form is 8 hours a day, unknown processing of information gathered during waking state. 3...