Skip to main content

Why one speak truth (blessing for honest men): Yajnavalkya's opinion

 This strict rule of my mother and grandmother, never to lie, has been guiding principle so far. Many people lie at face, mostly to be clever and some in fear. Talking in reverse order and talking nothing but lies is set standard of the society to be clever. In many situation, it appears those who lie and cheat alone get progress. Sometime a negative reflection upon progress to occur. However, progress is necessary and to give up this instinct is injustice to oneself. This constant fight between honest and liars may be running from time immemorial. 

This gain from lying and pain from speaking truth as it appears, what is the justification? Why should one speak truth? Every religion and pioneer of law seems to emphasis this matter. However, why? Social perspective is too lame to justify. Society is only the tool for individual man to progress and that too for all members of the society. 

However, no text seems to answer why one speak truth or why wise speak the truth. Panini's Raj Yoga has set rule, among which to speak truth is basic or practice required before practice of Raj Yog. Here, too the answer is deeper but not yet a direct answer.

Yajnavalkya in Sathpath Brahaman explained it in a manner like all sages of all time have done, to make a great deal as if it is nothing. The Brahaman explain, Gods does not like lie, hence one should speak truth as Gods like truth. For a naive reader it has meaning lesser than utility theory, or social theory or even yogic theory, however it should be read in the context of what kind of a man the sage was seeking. It was the established fact that men progress with the help of Gods/Devas (all Devas are paired with their female Devis) or that which shines or who aspire men towards light of Isha. Without help of these Gods, men can't realize the ultimate. It is again sages' trick to guide naive brains by explaining it in sufficient simplicity without harming the truth, do this and this and this, in Vedas without explanation and in Bramhan with rituals and myths and in Puranas Myths only. To attain that life where Gods and Men co-exist, Truth is the beginning, middle and the end. Evil forces in the life, mainly diseases and thoughts are to be won with the help of illuminating Gods(always pair). In this larger context alone Truth and logic to speak truth get established. It also sufficiently explain what life should look like. Neither being hungry nor giving up life one gets life's full result. 

वेदमनूच्य आचार्योऽन्तेवासिनं अनुशास्ति |
सत्यं वद | धर्मं चर | स्वाध्यायान्मा प्रमदः |

"The teacher instructs the students who are living in his hermitage: Speak the truth. Follow righteousness. Never neglect your studies."

Taittiriya Upanishad, Siksha Valli, Anuvaka 11, Verse 1


Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Sustainable development of Life

 XYZ whatever be the technicalities of a life process, the origin is, as I am convinced at this point of time, nothing but wish of Nature or who create the nature. The sole purpose of life is to consume itself. Consume is really the worst word in this context. Let me say to observe the beauty of itself by itself. Hence, we are designed in such a way with such and such purposes by the ultimate guiding truth which is ever full of knowledge of all kind. It can do anything (proof: various form of lives), it is evolved or it is ordained by truth can be a debate. Base of life is nature or life (especially human) struggle with nature to evolve itself. First one provide possibilities of re-creation of more sophisticated or more adaptable life suitable to the nature at that point of time, second is more egoist approach to life and claim nature as nothing but inert objects which are subject to enjoyment or preservation for enjoyment in future (as now discussed in the name of sustainable deve...
Post a Comment
Read more

Ethics : Dharma of Individual (Yoga Sutra)

 Ethics as virtue-  it is collection of desirable action for sustaining society. [dying for group's belief ] Ethics as utility- it is collection of desirable action for sustaining society and more rudely exchanged in name of utility, often society can buy desirable action for society and tag it with ethics. [dying in poverty is ethical but to save life by robbery is not] Ethics of universal rationality- whatever action that can be universalized is ethical and others are not. collectively it again universalize social needs over individual {I am deficient here....} Ethics of social contract- here even an attempt to hide the social behavior and labeling it as ethics has been withdrawn [collective interest labeled as ethics] In my limited understanding these alternatives, individuality is easily coerced by society. But these definitions are not capable to define anything at all. Many things now called Ethics are borrowed from religion. Mainly non-violence and etc. can be traced di...
Post a Comment
Read more

Dharma Ra Nyaya-1

 In no way I am writing with any certainty about these words or realities or whatever phenomena they are. But with quite a discussion with a learned friend of mine, clarity of thoughts seems to built within. However, from very surface reading and my own biases, Dharma and Nyaya have been same thing for me. Naya here is not a branch of philosophy rather justice in its strict sense.  What is Nyaya? In its day-to-day life, a decision by court of justice is itself justice. One can try to cry over and over yet in short run whatever a reason of court is will be justice. However, in truth, justice is related with what a pure human consciousness guide the human being as a justice is justice. Qualifying consciousness with purity may be a false attempt to define something undefined. Here, purity of reason can do good work. With hope , purity of reason coincide with one true reason by all human being. With a good wish, many have found to place great trust in universal reason or something...
Post a Comment
Read more