Skip to main content

Vedas and Person (how can we link Vedas with Justice??)

 Among all egoist behavior, intellectual ego is the worst. How funny it was that I attempted to learn Vedas directly jumping into English translation by Max Muller etc. It is the rule that 5 Vedangas [Jyotish is one from (where Jaisi are pioneers among Khas Bahuns)] must be learned before delving into Vedas. Whatever, my recent encounter with Nakshyatra and their ruling deities opened just another window for attempting to understand Vedas (by grace of mother Vindhyabasini/Bindrabasini).

Vedas especially Rig Vedas (Protecter class are given their protectorship) elaborate nature of these deities and which are the lord of Nakshyatras. Planets move through them, where nature of planets are revealed by Nakshyatra lords where Nakshyatra too posses their own nature but similar to their lords. They are constant lights whereas planets are moving ones. 

Here, the interesting part is Jyotish (I love to call them Jaisi, those Upadhyas (karmakanda section pioneers) whether like it or don't like it I don't like to care) chart planets over these Nakshyatra at the time of birth of any human being, which shows the belief that Human are incarnation of/ manifestation of these Nakshyatra/Adityas and their light on planets at the time of human birth.

It is more appealing Darshan (which means that which is capable of showing true face of the ultimate) that give human life a purpose. It is not mere accident or tragic scene that human and animals born rather it is Deities roam around earth using human vehicle. 

Now, justice right property person etc etc are pillars of modern justice system or philosophy. Here I explained what is person really mean in Vedic literature. And pioneers (forgive this fool tried to write about these noble things haha) will get here that Person is really the Persona or facet but it is not that vulgar a man tried to show to the world. Rather it is something hidden meaning of life that shows itself as Person in interaction with other Personas. 

.......... 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Hindu Jurisprudence- Smriti And some property law

I just don’t have the energy to write against the popular teaching (perhaps I have read the wrong books) that Hindu jurisprudence is contained within the Smriti, mainly the Manusmriti, and the property systems of the two schools — Mitakshara and Dayabhaga (I forget which region each school belongs to). But these are laws, not jurisprudence. I admit I do not know the subject of jurisprudence deeply — such a tragedy — but it seems to me these were laws made for the time and place according to the wisdom of the sages of that era. The Smriti writers themselves clearly said that the source of their understanding is the Veda. So, anyone who wants to understand exactly what truth Hindus hold must study the Vedas. Those who cannot may go through the Upanishads (major texts distilled by sages to teach the essence of the Jñāna part of the Veda). Those who still find that difficult may turn to the Mahabharata (which is in itself a “great battle” to understand), or they may study Mīmāṁsā, Nyāya-śā...

Sabda Bramha-Words are everything

They say Om is Sabda Bramha Vayu is Pratakshya Bramha I(Aatma) am Bramha I am the essence Sounds and letters ignite the mind They are capable of saying new things to mind Though not against Rit of the Bramhanda But they dont repeat they enlighten If that word be Om or Ram or Radha or Radhe or Bramha or Agni or Indra or Savita or ... No joy can match the joy of Naam Jap When emotion is so strong it lost itself in Mother then words may loose themselves But words no matter what are capable of carrying what is forgotten and what will one become etc. Title may demand more explanation - -- - -- - -- -

Dharma - Nyaya

(To clear my thought process ) Dharma is that which bears, that which provides stability to a thing, a person, or a nation in motion. Nyaya is specific to the individual; A person who abides in Dharma may still be affected by the Adharma of another who fails to uphold it then the State/Society must inject Nyaya to tha specific person or group or even state. Jurisprudence (in my limited understanding and information ) could not ditinguish between these two concepts and confused it with morale, divine rule, command, society, economics etc. These two are related, but Dharma is what guides the Naya but here it has nothing to do with legal system, it is independent and move with truth, whereas Naya alone requires legal system. Hence, Jurisprudence has long divorced its essence of Dharma (somehow natural school using reason could hover around truth) and focus on legal system alone. ..................