Skip to main content

Knower, Knowledge and Known

 In ordinary sense (I am not a philosopher of whatever kind possible), in understanding anything object, at least three agents are required. Knower (human or mechanical) is the one which can form the pattern out of that object under study and then store it in its memory for future uses. Knowledge is the stored portion, it may/may not resemble truth as long as it is replicable and fulfilling its objective it is fine knowledge. And the Known is the object under study or about which knower is making knowledge ( I am saying knowledge in the sense of its changing nature till it coincide with truth).

Can there be a situation/condition/reality where these three coincide? Yes/No. Haha it's a trick question or trick answer or whatever it is. Let us dance before mirror for sometime. When one prepare oneself before mirror, whether the reality is within mirror or outside of it. Quite obvious reality is outside the mirror. Proof: when we break the mirror it will not lead to destruction of the person before mirror. However, any physical changes with condition of person before mirror leads to change in picture captured in the mirror. It leads to the conclusion that irrespective of picture taking capability, reality is independent in itself. Hence, a mirror can't be the knower rather a mere apparatus of image, but the person before mirror is reality and is capable of knowing itself before that mirror. What is that the person before mirror getting as information? Nothing but information of itself which is stored as knowledge. What is getting known here is that same reality of the same person. Here, the knower, knowledge and the known coincide. 

Mirror=Buddhi, Ahankara, Manasa, Indriya etc.

Reality=Parmatma/Aatma/Bindrabasini/etc. 

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Sustainable development of Life

 XYZ whatever be the technicalities of a life process, the origin is, as I am convinced at this point of time, nothing but wish of Nature or who create the nature. The sole purpose of life is to consume itself. Consume is really the worst word in this context. Let me say to observe the beauty of itself by itself. Hence, we are designed in such a way with such and such purposes by the ultimate guiding truth which is ever full of knowledge of all kind. It can do anything (proof: various form of lives), it is evolved or it is ordained by truth can be a debate. Base of life is nature or life (especially human) struggle with nature to evolve itself. First one provide possibilities of re-creation of more sophisticated or more adaptable life suitable to the nature at that point of time, second is more egoist approach to life and claim nature as nothing but inert objects which are subject to enjoyment or preservation for enjoyment in future (as now discussed in the name of sustainable deve...
Post a Comment
Read more

Ethics : Dharma of Individual (Yoga Sutra)

 Ethics as virtue-  it is collection of desirable action for sustaining society. [dying for group's belief ] Ethics as utility- it is collection of desirable action for sustaining society and more rudely exchanged in name of utility, often society can buy desirable action for society and tag it with ethics. [dying in poverty is ethical but to save life by robbery is not] Ethics of universal rationality- whatever action that can be universalized is ethical and others are not. collectively it again universalize social needs over individual {I am deficient here....} Ethics of social contract- here even an attempt to hide the social behavior and labeling it as ethics has been withdrawn [collective interest labeled as ethics] In my limited understanding these alternatives, individuality is easily coerced by society. But these definitions are not capable to define anything at all. Many things now called Ethics are borrowed from religion. Mainly non-violence and etc. can be traced di...
Post a Comment
Read more

Dharma Ra Nyaya-1

 In no way I am writing with any certainty about these words or realities or whatever phenomena they are. But with quite a discussion with a learned friend of mine, clarity of thoughts seems to built within. However, from very surface reading and my own biases, Dharma and Nyaya have been same thing for me. Naya here is not a branch of philosophy rather justice in its strict sense.  What is Nyaya? In its day-to-day life, a decision by court of justice is itself justice. One can try to cry over and over yet in short run whatever a reason of court is will be justice. However, in truth, justice is related with what a pure human consciousness guide the human being as a justice is justice. Qualifying consciousness with purity may be a false attempt to define something undefined. Here, purity of reason can do good work. With hope , purity of reason coincide with one true reason by all human being. With a good wish, many have found to place great trust in universal reason or something...
Post a Comment
Read more