Skip to main content

Handing over Capital for clueless experiments(fashionable ventures) and luxury(through mis-utilization of loan)

 I still remember my grandmother told me at any cost seed must be protected. Capital is that seed which will be used to reproduce capital itself and rest for consumption. Whatever may be the problem of distribution (its true how wealth is distributed determine the protection of capital), protection of capital is undeniable fact. 

However, another fact is at first in any society wealth is distributed to the establishment of that society. When they turn out to be clueless about wealth then there will be no protection of capital. They will live a lavish life out of taxation. They want to show they are the one, but the reality will be opposite and then they start to waste wealth. 

In that society, no capital will be protected neither additional capital will be generated. It's better to intoxicate such powerful people in liquor and lock them for forever in luxury house than to give them access to national capital. 

Power coupled with cluelessness and ego of supremacy hurt the capital more than anything else. Since, major portion of income from capital gets returned to the country as tax, that tax must be in hand of prudent people, also private wealth is converted into capital through banking system, hence banking too should be run by prudent people. Allowing useless project which can't regenerate capital (at minimum) should be stopped at any cost. Any risky ventures should not be financed by any banks. One should take risky venture using own wealth, if successful (and regulators should support by all means other than publics money) reward will be huge. 

However, clueless people who have no sense of capital, how destruction of capital leads to poverty and even cost human lives, who are mad and always filled by using Political power at cost of taxed wealth should not be allowed to take even their own wealth at all. Since, it will be too far and all human are free to use their wealth however way they want (at least for me), they should be allowed to destroy their wealth but should not be allowed to use other's wealth (mainly banks' money and tax money). 



Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Hindu Jurisprudence- Smriti And some property law

I just don’t have the energy to write against the popular teaching (perhaps I have read the wrong books) that Hindu jurisprudence is contained within the Smriti, mainly the Manusmriti, and the property systems of the two schools — Mitakshara and Dayabhaga (I forget which region each school belongs to). But these are laws, not jurisprudence. I admit I do not know the subject of jurisprudence deeply — such a tragedy — but it seems to me these were laws made for the time and place according to the wisdom of the sages of that era. The Smriti writers themselves clearly said that the source of their understanding is the Veda. So, anyone who wants to understand exactly what truth Hindus hold must study the Vedas. Those who cannot may go through the Upanishads (major texts distilled by sages to teach the essence of the Jñāna part of the Veda). Those who still find that difficult may turn to the Mahabharata (which is in itself a “great battle” to understand), or they may study Mīmāṁsā, Nyāya-śā...
Post a Comment
Read more

Dharma - Nyaya

(To clear my thought process ) Dharma is that which bears, that which provides stability to a thing, a person, or a nation in motion. Nyaya is specific to the individual; A person who abides in Dharma may still be affected by the Adharma of another who fails to uphold it then the State/Society must inject Nyaya to tha specific person or group or even state. Jurisprudence (in my limited understanding and information ) could not ditinguish between these two concepts and confused it with morale, divine rule, command, society, economics etc. These two are related, but Dharma is what guides the Naya but here it has nothing to do with legal system, it is independent and move with truth, whereas Naya alone requires legal system. Hence, Jurisprudence has long divorced its essence of Dharma (somehow natural school using reason could hover around truth) and focus on legal system alone. ..................
Post a Comment
Read more

Vedas- The Ultimate -Darshan lets not say Philosophy it will be injustice to Great Sages

Vedas -Nobody knows what is it, it is praised by Sages of later dates hence people still praise it -I have not read any piece of paper (except the Secret of Vedas by Sri Aurobindo) which relates Vedas to Pshychology (which I think is still inadaquate (daring to challenge legend in my own foolishness)). 1.Some recites it like parrots 2. Some criticize it like Vedic sages were just fancy poets with lots of imagination 3. Some give it credit to later Vedantic development as part of Methods of Knowledge, which means Vedas are cave men and Vedanta were modern men 4. Some laugh about it since they worship Sun Moon lightening air etc. etc. Let me go one by one 1. reciting with full faith and accuracy have some benefits but it will limit to the level of brain only and that too for soothing purposes and other, which will produces mechanical results (results are bound to happen) 2. too poor may be who translated and criticizes it must lack knowledge of Vedangas, they were expert in musical no...
Post a Comment
Read more