Skip to main content

Dharma Ra Nyaya-2

Writing helps to clear the thought process and sometime to give up on some matter. Again writing to give up on these topics. But these two words are troubling me again and again. Neither I have read enough material of western mind nor eastern one. These are just childish thought of an ignorant man.
There is enough water flowing through river yet recycled and always anew. Nobody has ever been able to grasp the process of life and death, and really to conclude whether life is permanent or death is permanent or nothing is permanent and some even went far to cry that something beyond nothing is permanent. By using limited faculty of brain, which is not permanent I don't know who would have understood the permanent. Every measuring rod must be at first stable to give accurate measurement of thing/anything measured. Something that which is permanent must have been the measuring rod and not the other way around. 
Reading some lines of biography of may be the best mind ever produced by human history, John Rawls without understanding xyz of his thought process, it occurred that Chanakya, Manu, and other learned in Dharma (remember that Nyaya is hardly ever discussed) often went on to describe roles of each and every members of the society (whether they were just to them, I am not debating them here) and by that means they were institutionalized positions carrying roles. Similarly, John Rawls envision (may be in my limited misunderstanding) justice (must be Dharma) in the context of institution. 
Okay, then Dharma is possible in the context of Society or order of human life or collection of human life only. It seems Dharma is purely human construct then. Often correlated as source of Nyaya and which is based on Truth itself. That truth is said about permanent we discussed earlier or is same but named differently. Often poets of highest rank seems to dance in song of that highest one. By that inference we can say that to know is not possible but to be is possible. (extra guff ) 
Then the order can be built as Source/Ultimate-->Truth-->Truth of existence-->Law-->Dharma-->Society-->Human Survival-->Nyaya--->Human Happiness/Fulfillment
But can we say that Nyaya is delivered when dharma is followed which seems to protect society primarily. Ultimate goal/definition of Dharma will not be possible without construct of need for society. No society no Dharma. (may be too short sighted)
What about Nyay. Can there be dharma and anyaya at the same time. There could be, we have witnessed that in Mahabharata text, son of Bhimsen, Ghatatkoch was sacrificed in the name of causing Dharma. Shree Krishna, the great incarnation of Narayan, Vishnu himself didn't care Nyaya rather lobby for Dharma or society or long term survival of human race. Have there been Lord Rama he would not have caused such injustice which shows strategic minds are concerned with stability of the system and being winner of that game whereas ethical minds care for nothing than Nyaya. 
But what is this Nyaya, this which is the most desirable of emotion. It can be anything from manifesting war to forgiveness. It is felt by different people differently. There is no consistency about how it is perceived. It is known to the one who thought they have been delivered with Nayay. Its source as we have discussed earlier can't be Dharma. Dharma is rather wider term yet narrow before Nyaya for a human existence and its impression at a point in time. 
I want to be free from effect of Gravity, it is foolish and also against Law of nature hence also of human law hence from dharma but is Annya caused by Nature with me. Because I felt so, yes I felt so, nobody has ever been able to answer me Why should I care life and bound to gravity. Some best mind often tried to solve this piece of mystery by ruling out irrational mind, or mind which do not think in accordance with law thereby Dharma. But these are two different things as no rationale man ever answered very need of thinking human life or any life dancing over the earth. So rationality can never be the basis of explaining Nyaya. 
xyz abc xyz ........


Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Sustainable development of Life

 XYZ whatever be the technicalities of a life process, the origin is, as I am convinced at this point of time, nothing but wish of Nature or who create the nature. The sole purpose of life is to consume itself. Consume is really the worst word in this context. Let me say to observe the beauty of itself by itself. Hence, we are designed in such a way with such and such purposes by the ultimate guiding truth which is ever full of knowledge of all kind. It can do anything (proof: various form of lives), it is evolved or it is ordained by truth can be a debate. Base of life is nature or life (especially human) struggle with nature to evolve itself. First one provide possibilities of re-creation of more sophisticated or more adaptable life suitable to the nature at that point of time, second is more egoist approach to life and claim nature as nothing but inert objects which are subject to enjoyment or preservation for enjoyment in future (as now discussed in the name of sustainable deve...
Post a Comment
Read more

Ethics : Dharma of Individual (Yoga Sutra)

 Ethics as virtue-  it is collection of desirable action for sustaining society. [dying for group's belief ] Ethics as utility- it is collection of desirable action for sustaining society and more rudely exchanged in name of utility, often society can buy desirable action for society and tag it with ethics. [dying in poverty is ethical but to save life by robbery is not] Ethics of universal rationality- whatever action that can be universalized is ethical and others are not. collectively it again universalize social needs over individual {I am deficient here....} Ethics of social contract- here even an attempt to hide the social behavior and labeling it as ethics has been withdrawn [collective interest labeled as ethics] In my limited understanding these alternatives, individuality is easily coerced by society. But these definitions are not capable to define anything at all. Many things now called Ethics are borrowed from religion. Mainly non-violence and etc. can be traced di...
Post a Comment
Read more

Dharma Ra Nyaya-1

 In no way I am writing with any certainty about these words or realities or whatever phenomena they are. But with quite a discussion with a learned friend of mine, clarity of thoughts seems to built within. However, from very surface reading and my own biases, Dharma and Nyaya have been same thing for me. Naya here is not a branch of philosophy rather justice in its strict sense.  What is Nyaya? In its day-to-day life, a decision by court of justice is itself justice. One can try to cry over and over yet in short run whatever a reason of court is will be justice. However, in truth, justice is related with what a pure human consciousness guide the human being as a justice is justice. Qualifying consciousness with purity may be a false attempt to define something undefined. Here, purity of reason can do good work. With hope , purity of reason coincide with one true reason by all human being. With a good wish, many have found to place great trust in universal reason or something...
Post a Comment
Read more