Skip to main content

Dharma Ra Nyaya-1

 In no way I am writing with any certainty about these words or realities or whatever phenomena they are. But with quite a discussion with a learned friend of mine, clarity of thoughts seems to built within. However, from very surface reading and my own biases, Dharma and Nyaya have been same thing for me. Naya here is not a branch of philosophy rather justice in its strict sense. 

What is Nyaya?

In its day-to-day life, a decision by court of justice is itself justice. One can try to cry over and over yet in short run whatever a reason of court is will be justice. However, in truth, justice is related with what a pure human consciousness guide the human being as a justice is justice. Qualifying consciousness with purity may be a false attempt to define something undefined. Here, purity of reason can do good work. With hope , purity of reason coincide with one true reason by all human being. With a good wish, many have found to place great trust in universal reason or something like this. Can reason determine justice then? What is the comparing yardstick for justice? If Truth is that yardstick upon which reason is based and that reason guides the justice then Justice is the outcome of the Truth. 

However, when somebody hit me, to hit back is nothing but false hope of equality hence is not truth. Here, justice is not based on truth/dharma. Then, how can we say Justice is based on Truth. Since reason can achieve singularity only in Truth as it is the only constant thing/concept/reality, but justice can't run towards it. Whatever may be Justice but is surely not related with Truth/Dharma.

What is Dharma?

Yudhistir(Vyasa in Mahabharata) said Dharma is that which sustain and uphold the world. More lucrative one is from Chanakya, everything is moveable (challll) and dharma only is still (nischal). By combining these two formulas, Dharma is nothing but Truth. One can perform dharma only by knowing Truth itself. Anything other than Truth is Adharma. Ignorant(counting bookish as knowledgeable won't justify anything here as spiritual knowledge is blessing and hard earned jewel) men can't perform Karma that will be consistent with Dharma. 


It seems Nyaya is more about how we deal with others and in some cases how we fool ourselves too. Dharma is independent about these fooling around things. Every learned jurist seems (forgive me for writing like I have understood all jurist) to run towards Truth from Justice to seek base. 

Universal reason may not be the answer rather a universal oneness of that Ultimate declared by Upanishad which is one and same in all  and as declared by Vedas is in various forms and as romantic Puranas displayed it dancing in thousand forms is the answer. To preserve that by itself is Justice and that self is the Truth and is Dharma and is stable. By only through oneness doing anything against Dharma can be declared as Annya (Injustice) as Justice is dealing with others but others are merged in one self, hence Dharma can be applied here too. 


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Hindu Jurisprudence- Smriti And some property law

I just don’t have the energy to write against the popular teaching (perhaps I have read the wrong books) that Hindu jurisprudence is contained within the Smriti, mainly the Manusmriti, and the property systems of the two schools — Mitakshara and Dayabhaga (I forget which region each school belongs to). But these are laws, not jurisprudence. I admit I do not know the subject of jurisprudence deeply — such a tragedy — but it seems to me these were laws made for the time and place according to the wisdom of the sages of that era. The Smriti writers themselves clearly said that the source of their understanding is the Veda. So, anyone who wants to understand exactly what truth Hindus hold must study the Vedas. Those who cannot may go through the Upanishads (major texts distilled by sages to teach the essence of the Jñāna part of the Veda). Those who still find that difficult may turn to the Mahabharata (which is in itself a “great battle” to understand), or they may study Mīmāṁsā, Nyāya-śā...

Sabda Bramha-Words are everything

They say Om is Sabda Bramha Vayu is Pratakshya Bramha I(Aatma) am Bramha I am the essence Sounds and letters ignite the mind They are capable of saying new things to mind Though not against Rit of the Bramhanda But they dont repeat they enlighten If that word be Om or Ram or Radha or Radhe or Bramha or Agni or Indra or Savita or ... No joy can match the joy of Naam Jap When emotion is so strong it lost itself in Mother then words may loose themselves But words no matter what are capable of carrying what is forgotten and what will one become etc. Title may demand more explanation - -- - -- - -- -

APPL Fama-French three factor model

This model is built purely for educational and illustrative purposes. It is a simplified implementation of the Fama-French 3-factor model applied to Apple's historical returns. The model has not been validated for investment, trading, or financial advisory use.