Skip to main content

Humanity and Healthy Jurisprudence

 Some 10 years ago I was quite fond of physics. The road block introduced by Heisenberg (I don't know how much I understand his uncertainty principle) and that famous quote of Einstein that God doesn't play dice. Probability and distaste towards it rooted to these two pioneers. Lazy people have thousand excuses for not doing anything. Whatever be the course of time, now I agree there is no way to really understanding anything happening even in material world. Our measurement tools and tools of memory and analysis could never be perfectly truthful. I.e. truth lives on its own and any disturbance to it in the name of measuring is not acceptable to it even in material world. 

Now going back to what I really intended to write is what is humanity? and why humanity is in its true sense is healthy root of jurisprudence? 

For so and so I need to jump back to 4 realities of Upanishad, in summary, world in physical form, world in dream form, wordlessness in deep sleep and Brahaman beyond that deep sleep. Anything that disturb 3 realities is unhealthy. But the weight of physical world should be lesser than that of dream and so on. More we go towards Brahaman more weight must be attached. Since, Brahaman is explained or attempted to explain being omniscient, omnipresent and some word I forgot, there is no need of justice for that state. To reach towards Brahaman is the ultimate human goal. For that other three must be balanced. I don't want to argue anything or against Brahaman. Here other 3 realities are truth in its perceivable form. Healthy human is one who can exercise these three realities or state at his/her/their own will. Kants universal reasoning or something is valid only because all human experience is based on these three realities. There is no insufficiency as we go more towards other 2 states. Hence, violence is not inevitable other than in waking state where scarcity is predominant due to human greed etc. 

When we all get to know we are linked in a chain of same reality of sufficiency, bliss and peace we will be progressing well and in a healthy manner. Thus to let all balance their 3 states to reach 4th one is Humanity. Cruel activities is cruel because it is harming chance of getting to those realities. Hunger is not permissible for same reason. Anything that is limiting human from realizing their origin or God/Ishwor/Brhaman/Pasupatinath/Adi Shakti (Shree /Devi/Vawani/Bindhyabasini/Gayatri/Parvati/Uma/Maheshwori/Usha/Gauri/etc.) is inhuman. Inhuman activities are unhealthy because it not only disturb others it fires back who is performing those activities too. Hell and Heaven are real and is in the reality of human experiences. These realities are realities for everything else. Justice is to go towards these realities and injustice is to harm these realties. 

It is well known fact whose deep sleep is disturbed is unhealthy psychologically, physically emotionally and to cure these unhealthiness is letting all be free to be who they are in reality. And hence the justice is letting all being healthy in real sense and humanity is being healthy and pushing others to be healthy.  

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Hindu Jurisprudence- Smriti And some property law

I just don’t have the energy to write against the popular teaching (perhaps I have read the wrong books) that Hindu jurisprudence is contained within the Smriti, mainly the Manusmriti, and the property systems of the two schools — Mitakshara and Dayabhaga (I forget which region each school belongs to). But these are laws, not jurisprudence. I admit I do not know the subject of jurisprudence deeply — such a tragedy — but it seems to me these were laws made for the time and place according to the wisdom of the sages of that era. The Smriti writers themselves clearly said that the source of their understanding is the Veda. So, anyone who wants to understand exactly what truth Hindus hold must study the Vedas. Those who cannot may go through the Upanishads (major texts distilled by sages to teach the essence of the Jñāna part of the Veda). Those who still find that difficult may turn to the Mahabharata (which is in itself a “great battle” to understand), or they may study Mīmāṁsā, Nyāya-śā...

Dharma - Nyaya

(To clear my thought process ) Dharma is that which bears, that which provides stability to a thing, a person, or a nation in motion. Nyaya is specific to the individual; A person who abides in Dharma may still be affected by the Adharma of another who fails to uphold it then the State/Society must inject Nyaya to tha specific person or group or even state. Jurisprudence (in my limited understanding and information ) could not ditinguish between these two concepts and confused it with morale, divine rule, command, society, economics etc. These two are related, but Dharma is what guides the Naya but here it has nothing to do with legal system, it is independent and move with truth, whereas Naya alone requires legal system. Hence, Jurisprudence has long divorced its essence of Dharma (somehow natural school using reason could hover around truth) and focus on legal system alone. ..................

Sabda Bramha-Words are everything

They say Om is Sabda Bramha Vayu is Pratakshya Bramha I(Aatma) am Bramha I am the essence Sounds and letters ignite the mind They are capable of saying new things to mind Though not against Rit of the Bramhanda But they dont repeat they enlighten If that word be Om or Ram or Radha or Radhe or Bramha or Agni or Indra or Savita or ... No joy can match the joy of Naam Jap When emotion is so strong it lost itself in Mother then words may loose themselves But words no matter what are capable of carrying what is forgotten and what will one become etc. Title may demand more explanation - -- - -- - -- -