Skip to main content

Evil of ownership in the form of wealth and bliss in the form of Capital

Wealth is accumulation of things that are held for appreciation of price or for security reason whatever political reason they hold. Wealth is also that part which is not actively circulating in the economy or in the optimum uses form. Let me call all surplus owned by anybody [here only rightfully earned surplus I am discussing and not about any untouchable immoral goods which can not be termed as wealth - only illegal or immoral or sinful possession can be termed] owned as per legal system as wealth. 
Capital is that seed which can grow into tree producing more seeds. Hence, capital is also in the form of ownership of person but is actively running and producing itself.
Since, earth is obtained by human at free of cost material here and there stored for human discovery, anybody claiming ownership over earth is a mere fool. However, for creative production process and saving human lives, concept of ownership is best discovered by human mind. 
However, this occupation of materials termed by ownership is available over both wealth and capital. Ownership over wealth can be very harsh over other fellow human citizen as whomsoever control the idle wealth has minimum possible utility over that thing, hence free to utilize by human metrics in whatever evil intention they want to fulfill and equally so for good of human society. But for wealth, it is more of the holders discretion and is not obliged much by need of the society at cost of society. Since, the society is collective phenomenon, wealth is also collective one, since it is collective thing, its purpose should be for maximizing collective utility too. As long as things are in capital formation or anything that the society wants to cultivate for society, ownership is bliss. Time ownership become wealth it turns out to be individual thing serving individual purposes. 
Hence, capital or seed is the bliss of human lives but wealth is evil or potential evil of the human society. 

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Sustainable development of Life

 XYZ whatever be the technicalities of a life process, the origin is, as I am convinced at this point of time, nothing but wish of Nature or who create the nature. The sole purpose of life is to consume itself. Consume is really the worst word in this context. Let me say to observe the beauty of itself by itself. Hence, we are designed in such a way with such and such purposes by the ultimate guiding truth which is ever full of knowledge of all kind. It can do anything (proof: various form of lives), it is evolved or it is ordained by truth can be a debate. Base of life is nature or life (especially human) struggle with nature to evolve itself. First one provide possibilities of re-creation of more sophisticated or more adaptable life suitable to the nature at that point of time, second is more egoist approach to life and claim nature as nothing but inert objects which are subject to enjoyment or preservation for enjoyment in future (as now discussed in the name of sustainable deve...
Post a Comment
Read more

Ethics : Dharma of Individual (Yoga Sutra)

 Ethics as virtue-  it is collection of desirable action for sustaining society. [dying for group's belief ] Ethics as utility- it is collection of desirable action for sustaining society and more rudely exchanged in name of utility, often society can buy desirable action for society and tag it with ethics. [dying in poverty is ethical but to save life by robbery is not] Ethics of universal rationality- whatever action that can be universalized is ethical and others are not. collectively it again universalize social needs over individual {I am deficient here....} Ethics of social contract- here even an attempt to hide the social behavior and labeling it as ethics has been withdrawn [collective interest labeled as ethics] In my limited understanding these alternatives, individuality is easily coerced by society. But these definitions are not capable to define anything at all. Many things now called Ethics are borrowed from religion. Mainly non-violence and etc. can be traced di...
Post a Comment
Read more

Dharma Ra Nyaya-1

 In no way I am writing with any certainty about these words or realities or whatever phenomena they are. But with quite a discussion with a learned friend of mine, clarity of thoughts seems to built within. However, from very surface reading and my own biases, Dharma and Nyaya have been same thing for me. Naya here is not a branch of philosophy rather justice in its strict sense.  What is Nyaya? In its day-to-day life, a decision by court of justice is itself justice. One can try to cry over and over yet in short run whatever a reason of court is will be justice. However, in truth, justice is related with what a pure human consciousness guide the human being as a justice is justice. Qualifying consciousness with purity may be a false attempt to define something undefined. Here, purity of reason can do good work. With hope , purity of reason coincide with one true reason by all human being. With a good wish, many have found to place great trust in universal reason or something...
Post a Comment
Read more