Skip to main content

Unjust protection and promotion of Land and Share owners (Case of unjustly protected bank borrowers)

 Sometime I just wonder why in this land of devata, people are just running for unjust things. Then my mind reminds me that only few percentage of people are doing all these nonsense because rest are so use to Moksha they never actually speak up. 

Whole economy in this country can be described as followings :

1. land owners go to bank and using it as collateral take loan for business

2. they use that loan for inflating land price and must businesses run on credit 

3. large borrowers took such projects which should never be completed but just enjoy all luxury in name of such borrowings 

4. others so called high net worth individuals can enjoy margin lending (idk why they having liquid assets are given loan facility based on such shares) but given lowering value of such loan they are protected by banks or given unnecessary time to repay

5. why should they (both land(except for small borrowers whose whole property is one piece of land or agricultural land to sustain family) and share owners enjoy protection on their mistakes?

When everything is fine they are eligible to enjoy everything but when things get worse they should not repay that thing? if there is no destruction then how new creation can flourish? Are they like some class of pundits and kings born with full right to remain rich for forever and their mistake should also be borne by rest of the people? People without voice are here just be slaves and to be burdened always. Wage earners should pay all taxes (both direct and indirect) and so called capital owners should be allowed to lower tax rates, business concessions and loan for lower than lower profits for forever? Rest so called intellectuals and professionals job is to support them for these unjust practices? 

This country is just amazing as some are allowed 1000 mistakes and some are always ready to borne those mistakes. Even doing mistakes they are the position holders, wealth holders and status holders. People with low income jobs are looked down by society and those with tax evaders and fund mismanageers, incapable and not so interested officials in making any efficiency in job are seen as heroes of this society. 

Why? because society favors money without any question and state favors capital owners without any question. 

Comments

  1. Sushil ParajuliJune 7, 2023 at 11:24 AM

    Sir is this your frustration from bank audit? Would love to hear more from you on this - such a important topic. 🙏

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Sustainable development of Life

 XYZ whatever be the technicalities of a life process, the origin is, as I am convinced at this point of time, nothing but wish of Nature or who create the nature. The sole purpose of life is to consume itself. Consume is really the worst word in this context. Let me say to observe the beauty of itself by itself. Hence, we are designed in such a way with such and such purposes by the ultimate guiding truth which is ever full of knowledge of all kind. It can do anything (proof: various form of lives), it is evolved or it is ordained by truth can be a debate. Base of life is nature or life (especially human) struggle with nature to evolve itself. First one provide possibilities of re-creation of more sophisticated or more adaptable life suitable to the nature at that point of time, second is more egoist approach to life and claim nature as nothing but inert objects which are subject to enjoyment or preservation for enjoyment in future (as now discussed in the name of sustainable deve...
Post a Comment
Read more

Ethics : Dharma of Individual (Yoga Sutra)

 Ethics as virtue-  it is collection of desirable action for sustaining society. [dying for group's belief ] Ethics as utility- it is collection of desirable action for sustaining society and more rudely exchanged in name of utility, often society can buy desirable action for society and tag it with ethics. [dying in poverty is ethical but to save life by robbery is not] Ethics of universal rationality- whatever action that can be universalized is ethical and others are not. collectively it again universalize social needs over individual {I am deficient here....} Ethics of social contract- here even an attempt to hide the social behavior and labeling it as ethics has been withdrawn [collective interest labeled as ethics] In my limited understanding these alternatives, individuality is easily coerced by society. But these definitions are not capable to define anything at all. Many things now called Ethics are borrowed from religion. Mainly non-violence and etc. can be traced di...
Post a Comment
Read more

Dharma Ra Nyaya-1

 In no way I am writing with any certainty about these words or realities or whatever phenomena they are. But with quite a discussion with a learned friend of mine, clarity of thoughts seems to built within. However, from very surface reading and my own biases, Dharma and Nyaya have been same thing for me. Naya here is not a branch of philosophy rather justice in its strict sense.  What is Nyaya? In its day-to-day life, a decision by court of justice is itself justice. One can try to cry over and over yet in short run whatever a reason of court is will be justice. However, in truth, justice is related with what a pure human consciousness guide the human being as a justice is justice. Qualifying consciousness with purity may be a false attempt to define something undefined. Here, purity of reason can do good work. With hope , purity of reason coincide with one true reason by all human being. With a good wish, many have found to place great trust in universal reason or something...
Post a Comment
Read more