Skip to main content

Searching Indra

Given the supremacy among Gods and First among Adityas, Indra holds the uppermost position and is praiseworthy by all account. That's why some people never get tired of defaming first one in name of Puranic and even Vedic myths. Neither they know anything about this culture nor they can know. By saying this I can't leave contractors of Dharma to say whatever they like in the name of this Supreme one. They are more Pakhandi than those who just ignore or attacking as they are seeking to know at surface.


Let us just count some important factors for worshiping Indra:

1. Anything that is of important can never be achieved by force, hence worshiping or bowing before is the best strategy as is the only way

2. Worshiping any deity is desirable to perfect that aspect of life such as fire for speech, ashiwns for good health, etc. (as I am not much concerned about these perfections, someone else will explain these areas)

3. But Indra being first and foremost among 33 Gods, it partakes everything from everyone. It does not control it just pour out bliss and be intoxicated in bliss as everything blissful is under the taste of Indra. 

4. Any functions of any deity is perfectly attributable to them but Indra rejoice the honey out of it. Perfecting Indra or getting to know Indra increase the chances of seeking best juice from all fruits. It should not be however accounted as people who chant be Positive all the time.

5. All Upanishads seems not to forget this important one as bridge between Brahma (who is not even thinkable by words of Rishis) and human. Indra is the comrade who alone has tasted parts of that fruit. As we can only do/think/repeat/attempt what is our past experience or of someone else's, this first one among Adityas provide that tale of Brahma for us.



Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Sustainable development of Life

 XYZ whatever be the technicalities of a life process, the origin is, as I am convinced at this point of time, nothing but wish of Nature or who create the nature. The sole purpose of life is to consume itself. Consume is really the worst word in this context. Let me say to observe the beauty of itself by itself. Hence, we are designed in such a way with such and such purposes by the ultimate guiding truth which is ever full of knowledge of all kind. It can do anything (proof: various form of lives), it is evolved or it is ordained by truth can be a debate. Base of life is nature or life (especially human) struggle with nature to evolve itself. First one provide possibilities of re-creation of more sophisticated or more adaptable life suitable to the nature at that point of time, second is more egoist approach to life and claim nature as nothing but inert objects which are subject to enjoyment or preservation for enjoyment in future (as now discussed in the name of sustainable deve...
Post a Comment
Read more

Ethics : Dharma of Individual (Yoga Sutra)

 Ethics as virtue-  it is collection of desirable action for sustaining society. [dying for group's belief ] Ethics as utility- it is collection of desirable action for sustaining society and more rudely exchanged in name of utility, often society can buy desirable action for society and tag it with ethics. [dying in poverty is ethical but to save life by robbery is not] Ethics of universal rationality- whatever action that can be universalized is ethical and others are not. collectively it again universalize social needs over individual {I am deficient here....} Ethics of social contract- here even an attempt to hide the social behavior and labeling it as ethics has been withdrawn [collective interest labeled as ethics] In my limited understanding these alternatives, individuality is easily coerced by society. But these definitions are not capable to define anything at all. Many things now called Ethics are borrowed from religion. Mainly non-violence and etc. can be traced di...
Post a Comment
Read more

Dharma Ra Nyaya-1

 In no way I am writing with any certainty about these words or realities or whatever phenomena they are. But with quite a discussion with a learned friend of mine, clarity of thoughts seems to built within. However, from very surface reading and my own biases, Dharma and Nyaya have been same thing for me. Naya here is not a branch of philosophy rather justice in its strict sense.  What is Nyaya? In its day-to-day life, a decision by court of justice is itself justice. One can try to cry over and over yet in short run whatever a reason of court is will be justice. However, in truth, justice is related with what a pure human consciousness guide the human being as a justice is justice. Qualifying consciousness with purity may be a false attempt to define something undefined. Here, purity of reason can do good work. With hope , purity of reason coincide with one true reason by all human being. With a good wish, many have found to place great trust in universal reason or something...
Post a Comment
Read more