Skip to main content

Should our existence be conditioned?

 I use to listen from my grandmother how a boy should react to insult. How should one convert the negative energy for making it positive. But I always saw inadequacy in this technique. Showing a person who hurt us with counter hurting is basically giving credit to our success to that same person and with violence too. It is the negative condition for our existence and what we want to do with our life.

On the positive side, some say I live for my parents, wife, children etc. But what if there happens an event to affect them badly. Can they be source of our liability or source of our guilt? Are not we making them victim of our inability to cope with ourselves even after death.

Then, what is the condition that we should adhere to so that we can live with peace? 

First of all life is not conditioned but death is conditioned. A mistake can cause death and end this life's experience. All those conditioned must be avoided at minimum to live with peace. Life seeks continuity and rest are just consequence of this. Crowd wisdom of humanity is to save itself. Some may name it knowledge, science, art or whatever but they all are just attempt to protect this human race. 

Accepting beauty that life exist is enough for our existence as it exist irrespective of ones' desire to live. How can you condition what is unconditional? How can you then not love what is unconditional? When you love everyone everything like yourself, how can you not find peace and purpose in this existence?


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Hindu Jurisprudence- Smriti And some property law

I just don’t have the energy to write against the popular teaching (perhaps I have read the wrong books) that Hindu jurisprudence is contained within the Smriti, mainly the Manusmriti, and the property systems of the two schools — Mitakshara and Dayabhaga (I forget which region each school belongs to). But these are laws, not jurisprudence. I admit I do not know the subject of jurisprudence deeply — such a tragedy — but it seems to me these were laws made for the time and place according to the wisdom of the sages of that era. The Smriti writers themselves clearly said that the source of their understanding is the Veda. So, anyone who wants to understand exactly what truth Hindus hold must study the Vedas. Those who cannot may go through the Upanishads (major texts distilled by sages to teach the essence of the Jñāna part of the Veda). Those who still find that difficult may turn to the Mahabharata (which is in itself a “great battle” to understand), or they may study Mīmāṁsā, Nyāya-śā...

Sabda Bramha-Words are everything

They say Om is Sabda Bramha Vayu is Pratakshya Bramha I(Aatma) am Bramha I am the essence Sounds and letters ignite the mind They are capable of saying new things to mind Though not against Rit of the Bramhanda But they dont repeat they enlighten If that word be Om or Ram or Radha or Radhe or Bramha or Agni or Indra or Savita or ... No joy can match the joy of Naam Jap When emotion is so strong it lost itself in Mother then words may loose themselves But words no matter what are capable of carrying what is forgotten and what will one become etc. Title may demand more explanation - -- - -- - -- -

APPL Fama-French three factor model

This model is built purely for educational and illustrative purposes. It is a simplified implementation of the Fama-French 3-factor model applied to Apple's historical returns. The model has not been validated for investment, trading, or financial advisory use.