Skip to main content

Property Law and Income Taxation

 Income Tax

Taxpayer (TP) and Income to tax

1. Person to tax

2. That person's ownership over the property used to earn (labor and windfall gain??)

3. Difference in ownership over such properties at the year end and the year beginning (incremental ownership)

4. Assign the value over such properties owned 

Realization of incremental ownership over property :

1. By sale and disposal of inventories

2. Disposal of Non-Business chargeable assets (NBCA)/ Business Assets (BA)/ Business Liabilities (BL)

3. Pool disposal of Depreciable assets


Interaction of complex property law and income taxation:

- only those rights which entails economic benefits 

- complexity arises when those economic benefits are separable like in case of lease, taxpayer transfer only the right to use such properties

    -TP's initial ownership and final ownership is same (in case of operating lease) with different values of the leased assets

    - but the rent income grant ownership over rent property (hopefully +ve gain)

- another interesting case is that of option(put) over common stocks

    - option only gives right to sell those common stock at future date at the specified amounts

    - this right does not increase the ownership of the TP by sale of common stock as sell option is yet to exercise, he incurred loss of ownership over certain amount to buy such rights 

    - this right is acquired over option and not over common stock hence the taxation goes like that over the ownership of the option


 


............................................................................................................................


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Hindu Jurisprudence- Smriti And some property law

I just don’t have the energy to write against the popular teaching (perhaps I have read the wrong books) that Hindu jurisprudence is contained within the Smriti, mainly the Manusmriti, and the property systems of the two schools — Mitakshara and Dayabhaga (I forget which region each school belongs to). But these are laws, not jurisprudence. I admit I do not know the subject of jurisprudence deeply — such a tragedy — but it seems to me these were laws made for the time and place according to the wisdom of the sages of that era. The Smriti writers themselves clearly said that the source of their understanding is the Veda. So, anyone who wants to understand exactly what truth Hindus hold must study the Vedas. Those who cannot may go through the Upanishads (major texts distilled by sages to teach the essence of the Jñāna part of the Veda). Those who still find that difficult may turn to the Mahabharata (which is in itself a “great battle” to understand), or they may study Mīmāṁsā, Nyāya-śā...

Sabda Bramha-Words are everything

They say Om is Sabda Bramha Vayu is Pratakshya Bramha I(Aatma) am Bramha I am the essence Sounds and letters ignite the mind They are capable of saying new things to mind Though not against Rit of the Bramhanda But they dont repeat they enlighten If that word be Om or Ram or Radha or Radhe or Bramha or Agni or Indra or Savita or ... No joy can match the joy of Naam Jap When emotion is so strong it lost itself in Mother then words may loose themselves But words no matter what are capable of carrying what is forgotten and what will one become etc. Title may demand more explanation - -- - -- - -- -

APPL Fama-French three factor model

This model is built purely for educational and illustrative purposes. It is a simplified implementation of the Fama-French 3-factor model applied to Apple's historical returns. The model has not been validated for investment, trading, or financial advisory use.