Skip to main content

Property Law and Income Taxation

 Income Tax

Taxpayer (TP) and Income to tax

1. Person to tax

2. That person's ownership over the property used to earn (labor and windfall gain??)

3. Difference in ownership over such properties at the year end and the year beginning (incremental ownership)

4. Assign the value over such properties owned 

Realization of incremental ownership over property :

1. By sale and disposal of inventories

2. Disposal of Non-Business chargeable assets (NBCA)/ Business Assets (BA)/ Business Liabilities (BL)

3. Pool disposal of Depreciable assets


Interaction of complex property law and income taxation:

- only those rights which entails economic benefits 

- complexity arises when those economic benefits are separable like in case of lease, taxpayer transfer only the right to use such properties

    -TP's initial ownership and final ownership is same (in case of operating lease) with different values of the leased assets

    - but the rent income grant ownership over rent property (hopefully +ve gain)

- another interesting case is that of option(put) over common stocks

    - option only gives right to sell those common stock at future date at the specified amounts

    - this right does not increase the ownership of the TP by sale of common stock as sell option is yet to exercise, he incurred loss of ownership over certain amount to buy such rights 

    - this right is acquired over option and not over common stock hence the taxation goes like that over the ownership of the option


 


............................................................................................................................


Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Hindu Jurisprudence- Smriti And some property law

I just don’t have the energy to write against the popular teaching (perhaps I have read the wrong books) that Hindu jurisprudence is contained within the Smriti, mainly the Manusmriti, and the property systems of the two schools — Mitakshara and Dayabhaga (I forget which region each school belongs to). But these are laws, not jurisprudence. I admit I do not know the subject of jurisprudence deeply — such a tragedy — but it seems to me these were laws made for the time and place according to the wisdom of the sages of that era. The Smriti writers themselves clearly said that the source of their understanding is the Veda. So, anyone who wants to understand exactly what truth Hindus hold must study the Vedas. Those who cannot may go through the Upanishads (major texts distilled by sages to teach the essence of the Jñāna part of the Veda). Those who still find that difficult may turn to the Mahabharata (which is in itself a “great battle” to understand), or they may study Mīmāṁsā, Nyāya-śā...
Post a Comment
Read more

Dharma - Nyaya

(To clear my thought process ) Dharma is that which bears, that which provides stability to a thing, a person, or a nation in motion. Nyaya is specific to the individual; A person who abides in Dharma may still be affected by the Adharma of another who fails to uphold it then the State/Society must inject Nyaya to tha specific person or group or even state. Jurisprudence (in my limited understanding and information ) could not ditinguish between these two concepts and confused it with morale, divine rule, command, society, economics etc. These two are related, but Dharma is what guides the Naya but here it has nothing to do with legal system, it is independent and move with truth, whereas Naya alone requires legal system. Hence, Jurisprudence has long divorced its essence of Dharma (somehow natural school using reason could hover around truth) and focus on legal system alone. ..................
Post a Comment
Read more

Vedas- The Ultimate -Darshan lets not say Philosophy it will be injustice to Great Sages

Vedas -Nobody knows what is it, it is praised by Sages of later dates hence people still praise it -I have not read any piece of paper (except the Secret of Vedas by Sri Aurobindo) which relates Vedas to Pshychology (which I think is still inadaquate (daring to challenge legend in my own foolishness)). 1.Some recites it like parrots 2. Some criticize it like Vedic sages were just fancy poets with lots of imagination 3. Some give it credit to later Vedantic development as part of Methods of Knowledge, which means Vedas are cave men and Vedanta were modern men 4. Some laugh about it since they worship Sun Moon lightening air etc. etc. Let me go one by one 1. reciting with full faith and accuracy have some benefits but it will limit to the level of brain only and that too for soothing purposes and other, which will produces mechanical results (results are bound to happen) 2. too poor may be who translated and criticizes it must lack knowledge of Vedangas, they were expert in musical no...
Post a Comment
Read more