Skip to main content

Immortality


Om.

So says the Ishopanishad in her glory

Darkness is path for believer of non-birth

Greater darkness for believer of birth alone

Let us see both as one and one alone


We know from ourselves we are born

From others we will know they died

Pundits prescribed the same fate for us

For wise learn from mistakes of others


By great flood everything get destroyed

Manu alone survived with remaining seeds

Anything we have now are children of them

For seed protects itself by producing more seeds


New seed giver may think it is new one

But seed's essence alone transform itself into new

Can we say this one new or is it old one

In new time it is new but in reality old one


That old one that from which all seeds came

Wise call it by the name of para-Brahama 

Whose system is neither that of birth

Nor it actually follow the path of non-birth


These wheels of Sun is moving like this

In the same wheel parmatma is moving

By hiding itself in seed, making new seed

Making neither birth nor non- birth possible 


Let us then salute those offspring of that seed

Who identified themselves with that one

Let us salute to those words of Veda 

From which Upanishad happened to born


Om ! Peace ! Peace ! Peace !





 


 








Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Hindu Jurisprudence- Smriti And some property law

I just don’t have the energy to write against the popular teaching (perhaps I have read the wrong books) that Hindu jurisprudence is contained within the Smriti, mainly the Manusmriti, and the property systems of the two schools — Mitakshara and Dayabhaga (I forget which region each school belongs to). But these are laws, not jurisprudence. I admit I do not know the subject of jurisprudence deeply — such a tragedy — but it seems to me these were laws made for the time and place according to the wisdom of the sages of that era. The Smriti writers themselves clearly said that the source of their understanding is the Veda. So, anyone who wants to understand exactly what truth Hindus hold must study the Vedas. Those who cannot may go through the Upanishads (major texts distilled by sages to teach the essence of the Jñāna part of the Veda). Those who still find that difficult may turn to the Mahabharata (which is in itself a “great battle” to understand), or they may study Mīmāṁsā, Nyāya-śā...

Dharma - Nyaya

(To clear my thought process ) Dharma is that which bears, that which provides stability to a thing, a person, or a nation in motion. Nyaya is specific to the individual; A person who abides in Dharma may still be affected by the Adharma of another who fails to uphold it then the State/Society must inject Nyaya to tha specific person or group or even state. Jurisprudence (in my limited understanding and information ) could not ditinguish between these two concepts and confused it with morale, divine rule, command, society, economics etc. These two are related, but Dharma is what guides the Naya but here it has nothing to do with legal system, it is independent and move with truth, whereas Naya alone requires legal system. Hence, Jurisprudence has long divorced its essence of Dharma (somehow natural school using reason could hover around truth) and focus on legal system alone. ..................

Sabda Bramha-Words are everything

They say Om is Sabda Bramha Vayu is Pratakshya Bramha I(Aatma) am Bramha I am the essence Sounds and letters ignite the mind They are capable of saying new things to mind Though not against Rit of the Bramhanda But they dont repeat they enlighten If that word be Om or Ram or Radha or Radhe or Bramha or Agni or Indra or Savita or ... No joy can match the joy of Naam Jap When emotion is so strong it lost itself in Mother then words may loose themselves But words no matter what are capable of carrying what is forgotten and what will one become etc. Title may demand more explanation - -- - -- - -- -