Skip to main content

Imperfect human's imperfect God

 Vedas are the foundation of Sanatan Dharma, where 33 Gods/Goddesses are called for by hundreds of men and women (called Sages without requiring gender specification). The very source is not able enough to sought the multiplicity of nature by one name. It has been declared that the ultimate is one but we call it by various names. 

Later Vedantic claim one reality and one alone that is Brahma and no second. But what will be of that ultimate? Why ultimate created this universe which can be studied both to bigger and smaller material infinitely? Some may not believe that the God created this universe including human? But it is not that way I am talking, it is that ultimate principle or Law from which everything came, that is denoted as the God. It can be personified as persons too sprang from it. Putting aside this thing, why the perfect needed anything at all? All this pain and pleasure, ultimate realization and progress towards such, this misery of all things and being which came and which will eventually die in its physical form, God the perfect one need not to go through. 

The ultimate is merely a Sunya (not something - something = zero ) where everything is balanced and perfectly balanced. Only the imbalance can make motion out of it. and the imbalance is imperfection, imperfection is the misery. Wait, let me correct, imperfection is the joy too. The ultimate too must have a desire, and the desire to oneself it created itself in multiple forms and names. it worshiped itself and it hide itself from its creation. and let all creation search for it, by realizing which alone reality is established. 

This too shows, ultimate itself wants things and combination of things calling itself beings to be imperfect. By desire ultimate make itself imperfect. And human (still till date) are given intelligence to know its own reality which it coined the term God. 

Then the search of perfection is nothing but cheating one's own being and running away from the reality. So the human form of God lord Shree Krishna says just do your Karma, you are neither the cause nor the effect, you are just an agent, agent of mine. 

Let us enjoy our imperfection, let us try to realize ultimate is both perfect and imperfect but we are given with imperfection so to enjoy it. Let us our knowledge make our life ultimate oriented without concerning competition over other human forms. Let us include all human in a human set and end this useless fight over perfection.  

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Sustainable development of Life

 XYZ whatever be the technicalities of a life process, the origin is, as I am convinced at this point of time, nothing but wish of Nature or who create the nature. The sole purpose of life is to consume itself. Consume is really the worst word in this context. Let me say to observe the beauty of itself by itself. Hence, we are designed in such a way with such and such purposes by the ultimate guiding truth which is ever full of knowledge of all kind. It can do anything (proof: various form of lives), it is evolved or it is ordained by truth can be a debate. Base of life is nature or life (especially human) struggle with nature to evolve itself. First one provide possibilities of re-creation of more sophisticated or more adaptable life suitable to the nature at that point of time, second is more egoist approach to life and claim nature as nothing but inert objects which are subject to enjoyment or preservation for enjoyment in future (as now discussed in the name of sustainable deve...

Ethics : Dharma of Individual (Yoga Sutra)

 Ethics as virtue-  it is collection of desirable action for sustaining society. [dying for group's belief ] Ethics as utility- it is collection of desirable action for sustaining society and more rudely exchanged in name of utility, often society can buy desirable action for society and tag it with ethics. [dying in poverty is ethical but to save life by robbery is not] Ethics of universal rationality- whatever action that can be universalized is ethical and others are not. collectively it again universalize social needs over individual {I am deficient here....} Ethics of social contract- here even an attempt to hide the social behavior and labeling it as ethics has been withdrawn [collective interest labeled as ethics] In my limited understanding these alternatives, individuality is easily coerced by society. But these definitions are not capable to define anything at all. Many things now called Ethics are borrowed from religion. Mainly non-violence and etc. can be traced di...

Dharma Ra Nyaya-1

 In no way I am writing with any certainty about these words or realities or whatever phenomena they are. But with quite a discussion with a learned friend of mine, clarity of thoughts seems to built within. However, from very surface reading and my own biases, Dharma and Nyaya have been same thing for me. Naya here is not a branch of philosophy rather justice in its strict sense.  What is Nyaya? In its day-to-day life, a decision by court of justice is itself justice. One can try to cry over and over yet in short run whatever a reason of court is will be justice. However, in truth, justice is related with what a pure human consciousness guide the human being as a justice is justice. Qualifying consciousness with purity may be a false attempt to define something undefined. Here, purity of reason can do good work. With hope , purity of reason coincide with one true reason by all human being. With a good wish, many have found to place great trust in universal reason or something...