Skip to main content

Imperfect human's imperfect God

 Vedas are the foundation of Sanatan Dharma, where 33 Gods/Goddesses are called for by hundreds of men and women (called Sages without requiring gender specification). The very source is not able enough to sought the multiplicity of nature by one name. It has been declared that the ultimate is one but we call it by various names. 

Later Vedantic claim one reality and one alone that is Brahma and no second. But what will be of that ultimate? Why ultimate created this universe which can be studied both to bigger and smaller material infinitely? Some may not believe that the God created this universe including human? But it is not that way I am talking, it is that ultimate principle or Law from which everything came, that is denoted as the God. It can be personified as persons too sprang from it. Putting aside this thing, why the perfect needed anything at all? All this pain and pleasure, ultimate realization and progress towards such, this misery of all things and being which came and which will eventually die in its physical form, God the perfect one need not to go through. 

The ultimate is merely a Sunya (not something - something = zero ) where everything is balanced and perfectly balanced. Only the imbalance can make motion out of it. and the imbalance is imperfection, imperfection is the misery. Wait, let me correct, imperfection is the joy too. The ultimate too must have a desire, and the desire to oneself it created itself in multiple forms and names. it worshiped itself and it hide itself from its creation. and let all creation search for it, by realizing which alone reality is established. 

This too shows, ultimate itself wants things and combination of things calling itself beings to be imperfect. By desire ultimate make itself imperfect. And human (still till date) are given intelligence to know its own reality which it coined the term God. 

Then the search of perfection is nothing but cheating one's own being and running away from the reality. So the human form of God lord Shree Krishna says just do your Karma, you are neither the cause nor the effect, you are just an agent, agent of mine. 

Let us enjoy our imperfection, let us try to realize ultimate is both perfect and imperfect but we are given with imperfection so to enjoy it. Let us our knowledge make our life ultimate oriented without concerning competition over other human forms. Let us include all human in a human set and end this useless fight over perfection.  

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Hindu Jurisprudence- Smriti And some property law

I just don’t have the energy to write against the popular teaching (perhaps I have read the wrong books) that Hindu jurisprudence is contained within the Smriti, mainly the Manusmriti, and the property systems of the two schools — Mitakshara and Dayabhaga (I forget which region each school belongs to). But these are laws, not jurisprudence. I admit I do not know the subject of jurisprudence deeply — such a tragedy — but it seems to me these were laws made for the time and place according to the wisdom of the sages of that era. The Smriti writers themselves clearly said that the source of their understanding is the Veda. So, anyone who wants to understand exactly what truth Hindus hold must study the Vedas. Those who cannot may go through the Upanishads (major texts distilled by sages to teach the essence of the Jñāna part of the Veda). Those who still find that difficult may turn to the Mahabharata (which is in itself a “great battle” to understand), or they may study Mīmāṁsā, Nyāya-śā...

Dharma - Nyaya

(To clear my thought process ) Dharma is that which bears, that which provides stability to a thing, a person, or a nation in motion. Nyaya is specific to the individual; A person who abides in Dharma may still be affected by the Adharma of another who fails to uphold it then the State/Society must inject Nyaya to tha specific person or group or even state. Jurisprudence (in my limited understanding and information ) could not ditinguish between these two concepts and confused it with morale, divine rule, command, society, economics etc. These two are related, but Dharma is what guides the Naya but here it has nothing to do with legal system, it is independent and move with truth, whereas Naya alone requires legal system. Hence, Jurisprudence has long divorced its essence of Dharma (somehow natural school using reason could hover around truth) and focus on legal system alone. ..................

Vedas- The Ultimate -Darshan lets not say Philosophy it will be injustice to Great Sages

Vedas -Nobody knows what is it, it is praised by Sages of later dates hence people still praise it -I have not read any piece of paper (except the Secret of Vedas by Sri Aurobindo) which relates Vedas to Pshychology (which I think is still inadaquate (daring to challenge legend in my own foolishness)). 1.Some recites it like parrots 2. Some criticize it like Vedic sages were just fancy poets with lots of imagination 3. Some give it credit to later Vedantic development as part of Methods of Knowledge, which means Vedas are cave men and Vedanta were modern men 4. Some laugh about it since they worship Sun Moon lightening air etc. etc. Let me go one by one 1. reciting with full faith and accuracy have some benefits but it will limit to the level of brain only and that too for soothing purposes and other, which will produces mechanical results (results are bound to happen) 2. too poor may be who translated and criticizes it must lack knowledge of Vedangas, they were expert in musical no...