Skip to main content

Death and Truth

 When you see a train of people going after a dead body to perform last ritual, you may feel sad that someone left. But what we fail to realize is one day we have to meet the same fate. 

I use to think that I will know the truth and truth will cure the death and people will be able to come back from deathbed. My all time favorite SAVITRI by Sri Aurobindo depicts how Savitri take back her dead husband. Longing for knowing truth with the help of Physics, Mathematics then turning face towards religious texts, nothing satisfied me. Arts and Law helped to understand human necessities and necessities to manage its activities. 

Yet what is death? I don't know my birth and by blessing of God I think I will not know my death too. Then this madness called Life, a mass packed with limitless desires running here and there for life, own life, and some evils running towards others life. I don't know why Poets said soul will not die, and soul being the ultimate that know or for which this body function but we see it dies. To say soul is ultimate may be not that tangible. 

Fortunately I came to realize that the only truth is Death, may not be easy to face though. All human efforts are to postpone it. Human can't eliminate death of their own forget about others. But the mother earth is so generous she gave power to postpone it to those who make use of earth intelligently. Like the Bhagavat said Mother Earth is the Cow, Brahmin milk 4 vedas out of it and so on. Just by being Sanyasi and waiting for death as it is the ultimate reality will not make human any good. It is the virtue for which we must strive and virtue is in fighting the death till last breath. All those who strive for postponing the death are called Civilized society and those who wait are just like animals. We may disagree with life but it is what it is in existence, rest are mere theories or madness. 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Hindu Jurisprudence- Smriti And some property law

I just don’t have the energy to write against the popular teaching (perhaps I have read the wrong books) that Hindu jurisprudence is contained within the Smriti, mainly the Manusmriti, and the property systems of the two schools — Mitakshara and Dayabhaga (I forget which region each school belongs to). But these are laws, not jurisprudence. I admit I do not know the subject of jurisprudence deeply — such a tragedy — but it seems to me these were laws made for the time and place according to the wisdom of the sages of that era. The Smriti writers themselves clearly said that the source of their understanding is the Veda. So, anyone who wants to understand exactly what truth Hindus hold must study the Vedas. Those who cannot may go through the Upanishads (major texts distilled by sages to teach the essence of the Jñāna part of the Veda). Those who still find that difficult may turn to the Mahabharata (which is in itself a “great battle” to understand), or they may study Mīmāṁsā, Nyāya-śā...

Dharma - Nyaya

(To clear my thought process ) Dharma is that which bears, that which provides stability to a thing, a person, or a nation in motion. Nyaya is specific to the individual; A person who abides in Dharma may still be affected by the Adharma of another who fails to uphold it then the State/Society must inject Nyaya to tha specific person or group or even state. Jurisprudence (in my limited understanding and information ) could not ditinguish between these two concepts and confused it with morale, divine rule, command, society, economics etc. These two are related, but Dharma is what guides the Naya but here it has nothing to do with legal system, it is independent and move with truth, whereas Naya alone requires legal system. Hence, Jurisprudence has long divorced its essence of Dharma (somehow natural school using reason could hover around truth) and focus on legal system alone. ..................

Vedas- The Ultimate -Darshan lets not say Philosophy it will be injustice to Great Sages

Vedas -Nobody knows what is it, it is praised by Sages of later dates hence people still praise it -I have not read any piece of paper (except the Secret of Vedas by Sri Aurobindo) which relates Vedas to Pshychology (which I think is still inadaquate (daring to challenge legend in my own foolishness)). 1.Some recites it like parrots 2. Some criticize it like Vedic sages were just fancy poets with lots of imagination 3. Some give it credit to later Vedantic development as part of Methods of Knowledge, which means Vedas are cave men and Vedanta were modern men 4. Some laugh about it since they worship Sun Moon lightening air etc. etc. Let me go one by one 1. reciting with full faith and accuracy have some benefits but it will limit to the level of brain only and that too for soothing purposes and other, which will produces mechanical results (results are bound to happen) 2. too poor may be who translated and criticizes it must lack knowledge of Vedangas, they were expert in musical no...