Skip to main content

Reviving Vedic Jurisprudence

I may be making utter mistake of comparing western legal system with long lost Vedic tradition of knowledge. One may say Vedic system is still working for whom I have nothing to say. The day Adi Shankaracharya won over Mandan Mishra of Mithila, that day Vedic system lost everything. Is not Vedantic tradition Vedic one? It is but it is not too. As son is of his parents, yet he is not. Vedantic tradition though the part of knowledge in Vedas as janakanda but their approach is that of denial. for them by denying everything in the world at all alone can lead to the truth. Unlike Buddhist they try to establish in one rather zero all their end truth. 

Then what is the Vedic approach of knowledge? Is not Veda itself translated as Knowledge? 
Upon critical observation of word selection by eastern translator, one can see that it is referred as Sruti to hide everything else. More useable definition is book of knowledge. More, it is knowledge of knowledge. yes it is not knowledge itself but knowledge of knowledge. 

Writing for Research Methodology, it occurred to me again and again that there is also a path prescribed in Vedas for gaining knowledge. This method is not that of denial and nor of Meditation. It neither say to abandon life at all as illusion nor to cling to it. 

Every mandala of Vedas start with hymns to Agni. Scholar and Yogi like Sri Aurobindo treat it as the same truth being realized by different Sages over time. I always disregard this assumption, great Sages must not be inefficient enough to repeat in their book, at the time of oral tradition, to waste energy and time of aspiring students as well as theirs. 

It is Agni, the priest so claim the Rig Veda which has been invoked by the Sages of time immemorial as said by Madhuchandadas Viswamitra (Dhanajay) in the first hymn, who shows the path for further learning of the subject matter. if we see it in scientific research process then it is the methodology designed for further investigation for gaining knowledge. it is that Agni which takes every new information and burnt it to desirable output till the final goal is reached.

Finally collecting our idea of scientific method of gaining knowledge and Vedic tradition of putting Agni before every search, we can say that rules of law based on what is truth should also be reconstructed if obsolete discarded and finally reach what law must be there in place. Philosophy of law as it is as jurisprudence, legal principles that guides lawyers and judges to analyze the law in first place. These jurisprudences are built on scientific inquiry method developed by western philosophers and scholars. Cross subject study has been long founded and used everywhere. 

Then we can also use Methods correctly interpreted by Vedas to explain various laws provided by early scholars of our own legal system. As put correctly by Smriti writers and other laws, it is Vedas which must be last authority in determining the true meaning of them. Not as the book of knowledge but as the book of path to the knowledge, we may use Vedas for reviving Vedic Jurisprudence. 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Hindu Jurisprudence- Smriti And some property law

I just don’t have the energy to write against the popular teaching (perhaps I have read the wrong books) that Hindu jurisprudence is contained within the Smriti, mainly the Manusmriti, and the property systems of the two schools — Mitakshara and Dayabhaga (I forget which region each school belongs to). But these are laws, not jurisprudence. I admit I do not know the subject of jurisprudence deeply — such a tragedy — but it seems to me these were laws made for the time and place according to the wisdom of the sages of that era. The Smriti writers themselves clearly said that the source of their understanding is the Veda. So, anyone who wants to understand exactly what truth Hindus hold must study the Vedas. Those who cannot may go through the Upanishads (major texts distilled by sages to teach the essence of the Jñāna part of the Veda). Those who still find that difficult may turn to the Mahabharata (which is in itself a “great battle” to understand), or they may study Mīmāṁsā, Nyāya-śā...

Dharma - Nyaya

(To clear my thought process ) Dharma is that which bears, that which provides stability to a thing, a person, or a nation in motion. Nyaya is specific to the individual; A person who abides in Dharma may still be affected by the Adharma of another who fails to uphold it then the State/Society must inject Nyaya to tha specific person or group or even state. Jurisprudence (in my limited understanding and information ) could not ditinguish between these two concepts and confused it with morale, divine rule, command, society, economics etc. These two are related, but Dharma is what guides the Naya but here it has nothing to do with legal system, it is independent and move with truth, whereas Naya alone requires legal system. Hence, Jurisprudence has long divorced its essence of Dharma (somehow natural school using reason could hover around truth) and focus on legal system alone. ..................

Vedas- The Ultimate -Darshan lets not say Philosophy it will be injustice to Great Sages

Vedas -Nobody knows what is it, it is praised by Sages of later dates hence people still praise it -I have not read any piece of paper (except the Secret of Vedas by Sri Aurobindo) which relates Vedas to Pshychology (which I think is still inadaquate (daring to challenge legend in my own foolishness)). 1.Some recites it like parrots 2. Some criticize it like Vedic sages were just fancy poets with lots of imagination 3. Some give it credit to later Vedantic development as part of Methods of Knowledge, which means Vedas are cave men and Vedanta were modern men 4. Some laugh about it since they worship Sun Moon lightening air etc. etc. Let me go one by one 1. reciting with full faith and accuracy have some benefits but it will limit to the level of brain only and that too for soothing purposes and other, which will produces mechanical results (results are bound to happen) 2. too poor may be who translated and criticizes it must lack knowledge of Vedangas, they were expert in musical no...