Skip to main content

Frauds are not heroes

§1. I often hear from my childhood, be clever types of sentiment. I misunderstood it as being smart. Really people around me often prefer to be clever. With age I started to feel it is encouraged attempt to promote fraud in child or teenagers. 

§2. Preference of villains over heroes is also a prevalent here and there. It teaches heroes really can’t operate or only possible in films or literature. I also fall in this brainless assessment. Villains are preferred by their kind and heroes are by theirs. When majority of one become greater than others then it will be preached more vigorously. Because monsters promote monsters, it gives strength.

§3. Why frauds successfully operate then, because they are supported. Are they really successful? Absolutely not, they destroy the whole base of society, economics and family whatever they touch upon. Their children often fail to discriminate fraud and non-fraud. With lack of knowledge and gradual decreasing wealth their generation become criminals (in direct life taking). It is the worst thing anybody can give to their children.

§4. Society as a whole should prevent these frauds from taking leadership positions. I suggest even frauds to elect non-frauds in those places. So that they will also get better wealth, education and chance to clean their evil mind. 

§5. It is destructive mindset that fraud holds, which is worst than zero forget about creative mindset. They are not even good as barren land. They inflicts pain not only to themselves but also to everyone they get to know. 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Hindu Jurisprudence- Smriti And some property law

I just don’t have the energy to write against the popular teaching (perhaps I have read the wrong books) that Hindu jurisprudence is contained within the Smriti, mainly the Manusmriti, and the property systems of the two schools — Mitakshara and Dayabhaga (I forget which region each school belongs to). But these are laws, not jurisprudence. I admit I do not know the subject of jurisprudence deeply — such a tragedy — but it seems to me these were laws made for the time and place according to the wisdom of the sages of that era. The Smriti writers themselves clearly said that the source of their understanding is the Veda. So, anyone who wants to understand exactly what truth Hindus hold must study the Vedas. Those who cannot may go through the Upanishads (major texts distilled by sages to teach the essence of the Jñāna part of the Veda). Those who still find that difficult may turn to the Mahabharata (which is in itself a “great battle” to understand), or they may study Mīmāṁsā, Nyāya-śā...

Sabda Bramha-Words are everything

They say Om is Sabda Bramha Vayu is Pratakshya Bramha I(Aatma) am Bramha I am the essence Sounds and letters ignite the mind They are capable of saying new things to mind Though not against Rit of the Bramhanda But they dont repeat they enlighten If that word be Om or Ram or Radha or Radhe or Bramha or Agni or Indra or Savita or ... No joy can match the joy of Naam Jap When emotion is so strong it lost itself in Mother then words may loose themselves But words no matter what are capable of carrying what is forgotten and what will one become etc. Title may demand more explanation - -- - -- - -- -

Dharma - Nyaya

(To clear my thought process ) Dharma is that which bears, that which provides stability to a thing, a person, or a nation in motion. Nyaya is specific to the individual; A person who abides in Dharma may still be affected by the Adharma of another who fails to uphold it then the State/Society must inject Nyaya to tha specific person or group or even state. Jurisprudence (in my limited understanding and information ) could not ditinguish between these two concepts and confused it with morale, divine rule, command, society, economics etc. These two are related, but Dharma is what guides the Naya but here it has nothing to do with legal system, it is independent and move with truth, whereas Naya alone requires legal system. Hence, Jurisprudence has long divorced its essence of Dharma (somehow natural school using reason could hover around truth) and focus on legal system alone. ..................