Skip to main content

Auditors Dilemma

 §1. Using game theory, Prisoners dilemma problem and its equilibrium on confession by both prisoners we can analyze the audit game. In prison problem, two prisoners are given option individually, if they confess and other party doesn’t confess, confessing one will be free from prison term. In this way, for both prisoners confessing is best strategy and both of them end up behind bars. 

§2. Similar equilibrium can be obtained for auditors( internal and other assurance provider). In the audit game, let us assume two players viz. auditor and client. Auditors calibrate amount of work and client manage auditors by incentives or money to auditors. Maximum incentive for the given work is 50Lakhs, and maximum work to be done is 500 Hours (say). (Complete lack of information about others strategy is somehow not exactly same for auditors problem)

§3. In this game, suppose, client is of knowledge or estimation that there are errors and even frauds. Client will loose its reputation, agents their compensation, given the discovery of errors and fraud if any. While, auditors will loose reputations and ultimately their audit practices given non-discovery of errors. Later discovery of frauds also impair auditors image though they are not expected to fraud audit. 

§4. Here, client will offer lower or medium incentive say 50% of maximum required. In response to such strategy, auditors will lower their work from maximum (holding ethical and other legal requirements absent), say 50% of maximum required. Also, it is beneficial for auditors to lower the required hours to lower their cost of performing audit work. Lowering audit work is dominant strategy for auditors. Hence, low/medium incentive and low/medium work will be performed in case of client’s knowledge of possible errors and fraud, holding our assumption of absent ethical requirements. 

§5. Hence, the chance of discovery of errors by auditors in circumstances of errors and fraud by clients knowledge is not achievable goals for public at large. Game can be pictured as followings:


 Note: exactly the prisoners dilemma may not hold true and dynamic game may be required. It is my attempt to visualize the audit game in light of game theory. Hope to get Valuable suggestions and corrections.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Hindu Jurisprudence- Smriti And some property law

I just don’t have the energy to write against the popular teaching (perhaps I have read the wrong books) that Hindu jurisprudence is contained within the Smriti, mainly the Manusmriti, and the property systems of the two schools — Mitakshara and Dayabhaga (I forget which region each school belongs to). But these are laws, not jurisprudence. I admit I do not know the subject of jurisprudence deeply — such a tragedy — but it seems to me these were laws made for the time and place according to the wisdom of the sages of that era. The Smriti writers themselves clearly said that the source of their understanding is the Veda. So, anyone who wants to understand exactly what truth Hindus hold must study the Vedas. Those who cannot may go through the Upanishads (major texts distilled by sages to teach the essence of the Jñāna part of the Veda). Those who still find that difficult may turn to the Mahabharata (which is in itself a “great battle” to understand), or they may study Mīmāṁsā, Nyāya-śā...
Post a Comment
Read more

Dharma - Nyaya

(To clear my thought process ) Dharma is that which bears, that which provides stability to a thing, a person, or a nation in motion. Nyaya is specific to the individual; A person who abides in Dharma may still be affected by the Adharma of another who fails to uphold it then the State/Society must inject Nyaya to tha specific person or group or even state. Jurisprudence (in my limited understanding and information ) could not ditinguish between these two concepts and confused it with morale, divine rule, command, society, economics etc. These two are related, but Dharma is what guides the Naya but here it has nothing to do with legal system, it is independent and move with truth, whereas Naya alone requires legal system. Hence, Jurisprudence has long divorced its essence of Dharma (somehow natural school using reason could hover around truth) and focus on legal system alone. ..................
Post a Comment
Read more

Vedas- The Ultimate -Darshan lets not say Philosophy it will be injustice to Great Sages

Vedas -Nobody knows what is it, it is praised by Sages of later dates hence people still praise it -I have not read any piece of paper (except the Secret of Vedas by Sri Aurobindo) which relates Vedas to Pshychology (which I think is still inadaquate (daring to challenge legend in my own foolishness)). 1.Some recites it like parrots 2. Some criticize it like Vedic sages were just fancy poets with lots of imagination 3. Some give it credit to later Vedantic development as part of Methods of Knowledge, which means Vedas are cave men and Vedanta were modern men 4. Some laugh about it since they worship Sun Moon lightening air etc. etc. Let me go one by one 1. reciting with full faith and accuracy have some benefits but it will limit to the level of brain only and that too for soothing purposes and other, which will produces mechanical results (results are bound to happen) 2. too poor may be who translated and criticizes it must lack knowledge of Vedangas, they were expert in musical no...
Post a Comment
Read more