Skip to main content

Shopping door to door-stock to stock


 

It has always been my issue with wealth or envy of wealth, I am not yet sure. But one thing is for sure I have no attachment with it, I am born or experienced it like this. But with time and limited exposure to corporate wealth in Nepal, I came to appreciate wealth creation and preservation. How do we create wealth and preserve has always occupied my mind rather than what wealth is. However, utilities can never be measured directly rather it will be translated via price mechanism. When there will be limited and dependent buyer and sellers like in barter transactions or within boundaries of a small village etc. However, when there are independent buyer and seller, more than utilities it will be more of price discovery game. Limits of prices may be set by their inherent utility for assets to consume immediately or future utilities for assets to be utilized for future consumption or production of future consumption. 

How do we discover these prices? I rarely do buying practice and never sold anything so far. However, with luck  and blessing of Goddess, few friends were pro in bargaining or say at buying using correct or fair or bargain of their favor. They go door to door and discover prices. I thought for long time that these prices are inherent in their cost of production on seller side and purchasing power on buyer side. Which is in fact tried by both buyer and seller (when they could get information about ) on seller and buyer to bargain. However, that will or may lead to equilibrium prices however such is a dream of a short night, because everyone has different needs or sometimes (so called utility) and accordingly they value those things to be bought. Sellers may too have pressure to sell however in their part they have utility pressure of something else they have to bought by proceeds of things they will sell, just the selling products they have 0 utility in them other than selling. So, it can be fairly said, only way to discover price is to go door-to-door and try to test limits of sellers which is true cost+profit on their part. 

Now what about stocks, they seem to satisfy only investment needs. That is basically postponing current consumption with making one leg in current time (i.e. securing chances to sell and ensuring liquidity need when needed and unlike cash which can fulfill only liquidity need and can't hedge against inflation and deferral of consumption). However, investment too is selling goods and services to someone else in future and their return(profit distribution) to investors. rest.........door-to-door seller and these stock sellers are alike.........


I write these words or grammatically not so beautiful sentences to clear my head and is not any kind of claim on accuracy of their validity in real world. 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Averaging practice in stock market and Liquidity problem in Banking

Investors in equity market (secondary) are quite familiar with averaging practice of prices. When a stock of higher cost was already purchased but the prices drop down, then purchasing stocks at lower prices (must be probable to gain some increment in those latest prices) will average the per unit cost and given increment in latest prices but lower than previous prices till make loss over previously purchased stock lesser loss making. Now, thinking the institutional capacity of banks and financial institutions and production and distribution capacity of national economy, given flood of remittance, there must be a lag in mobilization of funds through banks. Thereby keeping interest rate at lower side till national economy's capacity to produce and distribute gets increased. However, let's imagine a scenario where funds are ever demanded and loans are distributed at higher cost. Deposit rates are increased in the name of liquidity problem or liquidity premium is so high that retu...

Hindu Jurisprudence- Smriti And some property law

I just don’t have the energy to write against the popular teaching (perhaps I have read the wrong books) that Hindu jurisprudence is contained within the Smriti, mainly the Manusmriti, and the property systems of the two schools — Mitakshara and Dayabhaga (I forget which region each school belongs to). But these are laws, not jurisprudence. I admit I do not know the subject of jurisprudence deeply — such a tragedy — but it seems to me these were laws made for the time and place according to the wisdom of the sages of that era. The Smriti writers themselves clearly said that the source of their understanding is the Veda. So, anyone who wants to understand exactly what truth Hindus hold must study the Vedas. Those who cannot may go through the Upanishads (major texts distilled by sages to teach the essence of the Jñāna part of the Veda). Those who still find that difficult may turn to the Mahabharata (which is in itself a “great battle” to understand), or they may study Mīmāṁsā, Nyāya-śā...

Usha

I bow down to mother Vindhyabasini/Brindabasini/Bindubasini whose grace and affection alone uplift unbearable pain of this life/ignorance. Nobody but Guru Gorakhnath is my Guru but am not that fortunate to get knowledge from himself. Neither read anything written by him.  During the discussion with few wise men it suddenly occurred or reiterate the already obtained knowledge of unreal nature of thoughts. However, this just helped to connect Usha with Savitur and once again ignite enthusiasm to write meaning of Gayatri Mantra. First line is dedicated to three kind of Jagat or realities excluding Om (which is not a wise thing to do but Om itself contains 3 Jagat and one last supreme reality so it is waste to discuss other line after explaining Om). First one is almost 16 hours a day i.e. waking state where we gather all information and act upon them. Second is dream state which is in its concrete form is 8 hours a day, unknown processing of information gathered during waking state. 3...