I don't know much about what is ethics at all. It seems something that is too hard to be written in law book is termed as ethics. Or something that is duty but couldn't thought of as showering benefit in apparent exchange at person to person basis. I may have wrongly learned it as form of Virtue from Kant or what impression I have got from. But why virtue etc. Basically all social norms are protection from death or fear of death. As a society human may save themselves from other things but they may kill each other. Ethics may be just a passive way to save oneself from death or perceived threat of death or perceived fear of death of society at larger scale. If this is just connected to death or negative form of life then it is worst than anything else as it will cause more fear of death. etc.
XYZ whatever be the technicalities of a life process, the origin is, as I am convinced at this point of time, nothing but wish of Nature or who create the nature. The sole purpose of life is to consume itself. Consume is really the worst word in this context. Let me say to observe the beauty of itself by itself. Hence, we are designed in such a way with such and such purposes by the ultimate guiding truth which is ever full of knowledge of all kind. It can do anything (proof: various form of lives), it is evolved or it is ordained by truth can be a debate. Base of life is nature or life (especially human) struggle with nature to evolve itself. First one provide possibilities of re-creation of more sophisticated or more adaptable life suitable to the nature at that point of time, second is more egoist approach to life and claim nature as nothing but inert objects which are subject to enjoyment or preservation for enjoyment in future (as now discussed in the name of sustainable deve...
Comments
Post a Comment