Skip to main content

Posts

Dharma - Nyaya

(To clear my thought process ) Dharma is that which bears, that which provides stability to a thing, a person, or a nation in motion. Nyaya is specific to the individual; A person who abides in Dharma may still be affected by the Adharma of another who fails to uphold it then the State/Society must inject Nyaya to tha specific person or group or even state. Jurisprudence (in my limited understanding and information ) could not ditinguish between these two concepts and confused it with morale, divine rule, command, society, economics etc. These two are related, but Dharma is what guides the Naya but here it has nothing to do with legal system, it is independent and move with truth, whereas Naya alone requires legal system. Hence, Jurisprudence has long divorced its essence of Dharma (somehow natural school using reason could hover around truth) and focus on legal system alone. ..................
Recent posts

Learning Model of Upanishad

Who will go through those text again... Just trying to relate some insights here There are few stories in various major (top 10) reciting how the students learned with their teacher (Bhrigu with Varuna, Indra with Prajapati,Svetaketu with Aruni). I never thought these stories and their relevance in that particular context. Upanishad is itself learning in proximity of Guru, wow just wow, and these stories are relating student and their teachers. Unlike classrom practice or guidance of Guru often prescribed in Smritis where service of Guru is the primary mode of learning or by grace of Guru one should learn, these stories simply show patience, in all these stories, Teacher(Guru or Bramhabetta) cater knoweledge that the student is capable of handaling or one can say, knowledge take one's mind in the form of insight or cloud that is full of water yet unable to shower, only there Guru strike with his enlightment and only to the extent student's insight, student will yield. Howev...

Vedas- The Ultimate -Darshan lets not say Philosophy it will be injustice to Great Sages

Vedas -Nobody knows what is it, it is praised by Sages of later dates hence people still praise it -I have not read any piece of paper (except the Secret of Vedas by Sri Aurobindo) which relates Vedas to Pshychology (which I think is still inadaquate (daring to challenge legend in my own foolishness)). 1.Some recites it like parrots 2. Some criticize it like Vedic sages were just fancy poets with lots of imagination 3. Some give it credit to later Vedantic development as part of Methods of Knowledge, which means Vedas are cave men and Vedanta were modern men 4. Some laugh about it since they worship Sun Moon lightening air etc. etc. Let me go one by one 1. reciting with full faith and accuracy have some benefits but it will limit to the level of brain only and that too for soothing purposes and other, which will produces mechanical results (results are bound to happen) 2. too poor may be who translated and criticizes it must lack knowledge of Vedangas, they were expert in musical no...

Why Gyan kanda (method of knowledge) is inferior to Karma Kanda (method of Yagik Karma)

Often vedantian claim only knowledge can burn (i heard I dont know exactly)the seed of desire and Yagik Karma only leads to desire fulfillment so Gyan kanda is superior or only true way to liberation. To my own surprise I find Karma Kanda superior (it sounds nothing less than Andhabiswas) -When everything is 1 even maya is part of Brahaman and this 3 out of 4 states are reality too including seeds of desire, then nothing is left to burn. -Yagik Karma unlike method of knowledge is performed at particular time with perfect notes and prescribed words and group of words, which are capable of producing effects in brain, even activate past memories. While knowledge is past, it is not present, it is invocation of memory only. It can lead to Yagik Karma at best or functioing in the same style as previous however memory is memory at best it helps to function and at worst it leads to sorrow (remembering sadness it produces effect of sadness, remembering happiness it produce sorrow by knowing wh...

Funny Interpretations of Vedas

Nothing to write Vedas are not to be taught for free(especially not free to exchange with material wealth), even if I know about Vedas. But till date I see nothing but funny interpretations of it other than those written in Sanskrit (because I dont know sanskrit, else I would have said same for them too because it cant be interpreated), mostly the english translations. Both by Indians, Nepalese and rest of the world. Vedas are great, insanly great, if you want to know, know yourself, I am not anyone with responsibility(and knowledge too) to teach it. It is what it is, there is nothing other than Vedas, only to that extent I will say rest I dont care.

Darling! Madhumati

Oh Darling dont show me your face I can sense that you are approaching Every steps of yours throbe my heart Like some notes are airing through air Suddenly my ugly face shine with rays My cheek braged with full on smile I thought I will sing a song for you See my confidence with this coarse voice You enthraled every cell in my body My poor clothes and apperance My inability to embrace the wealth Bathed in fullness of golden pond Darling! dont show me your face Just by your insight I am shaking The day you will embrace me I may cease to breath anymore These steps are full of honey(madhu) Even your steps are full of honey How beautifully you must be moving Even insight of your steps are honeyed I may run away watching your face For I have nothing but ugly face I may never speak with you For I have nothing but coarse voice I may never write about you For I know nothing about grammer I may neve sketch you For I know nothing about colors Darling! just a bit of it let me see you both...

Against whom we fight

Mostly we who attend university dont get access to Nepalese history There is no analysis of who we are also, that is our pshychology and our aspiration Some are desperate to show we are peace lover Budhist (which is rightly so to honor such a great being) but we are not that much of number to adhere Buddhism (sufficiently large though) Some are ultra modern full of communism but seems nobody has tried to compile what it means to be communist in Nepal, why we need that and what faults were there in our previous society (there were problems even of inhuman nature) philosophically Some are feminist whose lense cant see more than one gender Some are stupid racist who cant see more than their caste or race Some are blind knows nothing yet hold tradition (which is in large number) and are innocent even to become inhuman sometimes because they also dont know how modern mind thinks and also dont know true meaning of old text (most people dont even have access to Sanskrit due to deficient educt...